The Underground Library
[vimeo http://vimeo.com/61258052]
Education for K12 + Citizens ©1996 – ©2026
[vimeo http://vimeo.com/61258052]
Sorry Dr. Strangelove You can’t prove that NOT that having your privacy respected by the American Government will harm you.
Might as well know that it is the exact same thing as living in China.
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/14124172-scotus-approves-warrantless-wiretapping
If you’re worried about the United States government tapping your phone or perusing your emails, don’t complain to the US Supreme Court about it. They don’t want to hear it.
Today, the court ruled that citizens cannot challenge a federal law that allows for warrantless surveillance of international phone calls and emails. The ruling was a blow for civil rights activists and lawyers, and a victory for the Obama administration.
The justices voted 5-4, largely along ideological lines, in favor of the law, which was implemented in 2008. They claimed that the citizens represented by the American Civil Liberties Union-including Amnesty International, lawyers, journalists and international human rights activists-could not sufficiently show that they were actually being harmed by the potential surveillance.
Six Strikes is not a law only a 4 year private agreement. Six 6 Strikes is Phoney it is only a MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING not a law.
ISP snooping is disgusting. It isn’t enough to say you have rights you have to use them to prove that have rights.
Pete Seeger – Where’s your conscience?
This land was made for you and me!
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISlP9k2R3SM]
LARIAT.NET is a local Internet service provider
NetZero DSL
TOAST.net
CenturyLink High-Speed
Wireless Guide
Six 6 Strikes is Phoney it is only a MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING not a law.
Administering “six strikes” is a new entity called the Center for Copyright Information (CCI), which was established by the entertainment industry and the ISP industry. (Internet users were not part of the negotiations.) In other words, Internet users can be punished because of accusations by the copyright industry, but no one is necessarily verifying the claims.
First, this plan is not a law at all. It is a voluntary agreement between copyright holders and ISPs. Second, this plan does not mandate that ISPs completely cut subscribers’ Internet access. The burden of proof on the Internet subscriber, who must prove that he did not illegally download copyrighted content.
It is a 4 year private agreement among the following:
AND These Participating ISPs
http://www.scribd.com/doc/91987640/CCI-MOU
Center for Copyright Infringement = CCI
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2402521,00.asp
Jill Lesser, CCI as executive director.who previously served as a First Amendment advocate for People for the American Way (PFAW), most recently served as a senior vice president for domestic public policy for AOL Time Warner. She now leads the CCI as executive director.
K-12 COPYRIGHT LAWS: PRIMER FOR TEACHERS
CCI Committee:
The executive board of the CCI includes: chairman Thomas Dailey, vice president and deputy general council at Verizon; executive vice president and general counsel Steven M. Marks, currently the executive vice president and general counsel at the RIAA; and members Marianne Grant, senior vice president for the MPAA; Alan Lewine, senior counsel for Comcast; Daniel Mandil, associate general counsel for Verizon; and Brent Olson, vice president of public policy for AT&T.
The advisory board is made up of Gigi Sohn, president and chief executive of Public Knowledge; Jerry Berman, chairman of the Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee; Marsali Hancock, president of iKeepSafe.org; and Jules Polenetsky, director of the Future of Privacy Forum.
CCI says. “The ISP will determine which of its subscriber accounts was allocated the specified IP address at the applicable date and time and then send an alert to the subscriber whose account has been identified. The alert will notify the subscriber that his/her account may have been misused for potentially illegal file sharing, explain and why the action is illegal and a violation of the ISP’s policies and provide advice about how to avoid receiving further alerts as well as how to locate film, television and music content legally.”
CCI also begins doing business as a number of judicial rulings have blocked copyright holders’ attempts to compel ISPs to divulge the IP addresses of customers without a formal lawsuit. The CCI’s partnership between the content creators and ISPs would sidestep that process.
ACCORDING TO THE CCI Executive Committee THEY GET TO DEFINE YOUR RIGHTS ACCORDING TO SOMEONE THEY PICK.
Chris Dodd Joining MPAA As Top Lobbyist
Breaking Promise Not To Become A Lobbyist Just Weeks After Leaving Senate 2011
2.4. Fair Use
A Subscriber shall prevail on this defense if the Subscriber adequately and credibly demonstrates fair use of the copyrighted work under prevailing principles of copyright law (which shall be identified as described in section 6).
Page 35 Section 6. Legal Principles to Be Applied in Independent Review.
The Independent Review process will, to the extent relevant, apply prevailing legal principles as determined by United States federal courts. The Administering Organization will commission an accepted, independent expert on copyright law, who is approved by the CCI Executive Committee, to outline prevailing legal principles of fair use for purposes of deciding defenses of fair use, and any other legal principles necessary for resolution of issues within the scope of this Independent Review process. Such outline will be updated from time to time as necessary. If additional material questions of law arise as the Independent Review process is implemented, they may be referred to an accepted, independent expert approved by the CCI Executive Committee as needed. The Administering Organization will advise the Parties to the Agreement of issues referred to, and principles determined by, such an expert, and provide a process for the Parties to the Agreement to provide input concerning the issues, so as to ensure that the expert’s determinations are fully-informed and reflect prevailing law as determined by United States federal courts.
If additional material questions of law arise as the Independent Review process is implemented, they may be referred to an accepted, independent expert approved by the CCI Executive Committee as needed. The Administering Organization will advise the Parties to the Agreement of issues referred to, and principles determined by, such an expert, and provide a process for the Partiesto the Agreement to provide input concerning the issues, so as to ensure that the expert’s determinations are fully-informed and reflect prevailing law as determined by United States federal courts.
Guide to United States Copyright Law as Applied to Multimedia Productions
[scribd id=91987640 key=key-2aha2402d6u8oubh1bg5 mode=scroll]