ECP NetHappenings AI companies didn’t just buy books it’s worse

❤️️ Sign Up ©2026 NetHappenings News Email List
https://cyberplayground.org
©2026 Follow@CyberPlayGround
©1998-©2026 *Educational CyberPlayGround®
©2026 https://k12playground.com
©2026 https://RichAsHell.com
©1993 – ©2026 https://edu-cyberpg.com

LINK THIS IS THE ENTIRE AI INDUSTRY’S NIGHTMARE IN ONE QUOTE.
An author suing OpenAI says AI companies didn’t just buy books.
They allegedly downloaded them from pirate sites.
Then, according to his claim, stripped away copyright pages and ISBN information before feeding the material into AI models.
https://x.com/allenanalysis/status/2061504329266176362

LINK  Lending $620M to a firm tied to Donald Trump Jr. is one of many actions by the Trump administration that have helped companies in which the Trump family holds stakes.
But it’s the first contract to be directly linked to White House intervention.
https://www.propublica.org/article/donald-trump-jr-vulcan-deal-white-house

LINK  The Epstein files that are available have already pulled back part of the mask. And the DOJ haven’t even released 3m of the files, undoubtedly showing the worst of the crimes against humanity.
One released email to Jeffrey Epstein from Bill Gates: “How do we get rid of poor people as a whole?”
The real lesson is that wealth, prestige, and carefully crafted public images are not substitutes for accountability. Sky Roberts read his late sister’s sworn testimony at the May 12 House hearing.
“Name a person Ghislaine Maxwell directed you to have sex with.” “Prince Andrew.” “Who else?” “Glenn Dubin.”
Giuffre is dead. Her brother said the names for her.
https://x.com/epsteinsearchin/status/2061109079540637696

LINK  VIDEO “Conspiracy of Silence” 1:02:46  Boys Town used to abuse children.
Larry King was the center of transporting children around the country.
The banned Franklin scandal Gov. Child Sex Rings documentary, before Epstein and Bohemian Grove, “Conspiracy of Silence” was pulled from TV at the last minute, its broadcast cancelled and buried while grand juries later called the trafficking claims a “carefully crafted hoax.”
Tonight I’m premiering the raw, nearly unedited version of what TV was supposed to air. The banned Franklin scandal Gov. Child Sex Rings documentary, before Epstein and Bohemian Grove, “Conspiracy of Silence” was pulled from TV at the last minute, its broadcast cancelled and buried while grand juries later called the trafficking claims a “carefully crafted hoax.”
Watch here https://x.com/JoshWhoX/status/2061467556175896882

ESSAY

Handre @Handre
LINK  The Panic of 1907 is the most brazen financial coup in American history: a calculated assault on the nation’s monetary system orchestrated by J.P. Morgan himself.

J.P. Morgan engineered the entire catastrophe for his own benefit. The collapse of the Knickerbocker Trust Company in October 1907 sent depositors racing to withdraw their money from banks across New York. Morgan had advance knowledge of Knickerbocker’s copper speculation losses and chose exactly when to pull the trigger on public confidence.

Watch how the dominoes fell. Morgan controlled the flow of information about which banks were “sound” and which weren’t. He decided which institutions received emergency loans and which died. When the Trust Company of America faced runs, Morgan theatrically examined their books for hours before announcing they deserved saving. The performance was calculated: create maximum panic, then position yourself as the savior. Charles Barney, Knickerbocker’s president, killed himself rather than face the disgrace. Morgan played puppet master while the human cost mounted.

The endgame was always a central bank. Morgan had watched European central banks coordinate responses to financial crises and wanted that power centralized in America. He needed public demand for it first. Nothing creates demand for government intervention like a crisis that private actors supposedly can’t handle. Conveniently, only Morgan had the resources to stem the panic he had created. He forced the Treasury Secretary to deposit federal funds in his chosen banks. He personally decided which financial institutions lived or died.

Congress took the bait perfectly. The Aldrich-Vreeland Act passed in 1908, creating the National Monetary Commission that would design the Federal Reserve System. Morgan’s associates staffed the commission. They had their central bank blueprint ready before the panic even ended.

The Federal Reserve Act passed in 1913, giving Wall Street exactly what it wanted: socialized losses and privatized gains, with the government’s money printer backing their plays.

▓▓▓—▓▓▓—▓▓▓

ECP NetHappenings Trump and his followers

❤️️ Sign Up ©2026 NetHappenings News Email List
https://cyberplayground.org
©2026 Follow@CyberPlayGround
©1998-©2026 *Educational CyberPlayGround®
©2026 https://k12playground.com
©2026 https://RichAsHell.com
©1993 – ©2026 https://edu-cyberpg.com

A federal judge blocked major parts of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s vaccine overhaul, ruling that his actions to revise the childhood vaccine schedule and replace the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel were unlawful and “arbitrary and capricious”.

 

Burgum has 2 weeks to remove Trump’s name from the Kennedy Center!
There cannot be an appeal per the judge on this case. The decision that Trump’s name must be removed is final. The judge left no room for Trump to appeal the decision. THE ORDER IS A PERM INJUNCTION it is not subject to appeal read it. Further Congress LEGISLATED Kennedy Center only Congress can change it so there is zero discussion.

Two Years Ago .. Trump was convicted of 34 felonies, now…
the “ballroom” will have a bunker underneath where he sill hid so he doesn’t ever leave the whitehouse and a “DronePort” on top. It’s not just a childish extravagance. It will be a kind of military encampment.
All the more reason, obviously, for Congress to stop it.

On This Day Trump’s Father arrested at this Klan rally in Queens, NY on this day in 1927

A reminder that DOJ has sued 30 states for access to their sensitive voter files. DOJ is currently 0-8 in decided cases.

The future of democracy is on the docket. He should already be in jail for destroying a National Historic Landmark, The East Wing.

The UFC event is for celebrating #Trump ‘s 80th birthday not America’s 250th.
The White House, the people’s house been desecrated and turned into Mar-A-Pedo 2.0.

THEY’RE PUTTING ON A “REDNECK CARNIVAL” for their David Duke  base…..
YEE-HAW! THEY’RE GONNA LOVE IT!

WOMEN’S RIGHTS

All men can cross state lines without getting stopped.
Pregnant women can and have been stopped and arrested.

Republicans in North Carolina just proposed a bill that says if a woman is caught with an IUD or attempts to get an abortion then men are allowed to use DEADLY FORCE to try and stop her. They are proposing a bill that will allow men to kill women for using birth control. It’s House Bill 1232. Keith Kidwell is the Republican who proposed the bill. He claims it counts as self defense to use deadly force to stop abortion. This is a man who claims to be pro life. Feel free to give his office a call and let him know how you feel about his opinion.
And for anyone who says “obviously this will never get passed” that’s not the point. The point is it’s fucking insanity that a government official would even try to make a law like this. It’s insanity that there are men out there who are trying to make it legal to kill women for making decisions for their own bodies. This is real and it’s happening right now in front of our eyes.

ECP NetHappenings Citing ‘severe’ math deficits, UC faculty demand a return to SAT tests for STEM applicants

❤️️ Sign Up ©2026 NetHappenings News Email List
https://cyberplayground.org
©2026 Follow@CyberPlayGround
©1998-©2026 *Educational CyberPlayGround®
©2026 https://k12playground.com
©2026 https://RichAsHell.com
©1993 – ©2026 https://edu-cyberpg.com

Citing ‘severe’ math deficits, UC faculty demand a return to SAT tests for STEM applicants

In 2020 a student could apply to college without taking the SAT’s.

LINKNOW The K12PlayGround.com™ platform promotes your K12 students talents and skills without the need for tests.

Show everybody what Your School Students can do!
K12PlayGround.com™ Find U.S. K12 Public, Private, and Charter Schools
https://k12playground.com/

In an era when AI can write essays and pass tests, the skills you can’t fake are the ones you demonstrate with your body, your peers, and your voice. Evidencing skills through play builds the portfolio no algorithm can replicate.
The first and oldest online K-12 School Website Directory in the world, originating from 1993.
Find and Add Authentic Projects

It’s still Twitter.
It’s still the Kennedy Center.
It’s still the Department of Defense.
It’s still the Gulf of Mexico.
And Donald Trump is still a rapist.

ESSAYS

Ricardo @Ric_RTP
https://x.com/Ric_RTP/status/2061440269040373836″
This Google insider just revealed what AI is actually being used for behind closed doors. It has nothing to do with chatbots. Mo Gawdat was a senior executive at Google for over a decade. He watched AI get built from the inside. He was in the rooms, in the labs, in the government meetings in China that almost no Western executive was allowed into. And he just went on Diary of a CEO and said things that no active tech executive would ever be allowed to say publicly: “What the general public sees about AI is overhyped but ineffective. What the real geeks see inside the lab is genuinely world-changing.” The public gets chatbots and AI-generated videos while the labs are building autonomous weapons systems, military targeting technology, real-time surveillance infrastructure, and self-improving code that rewrites itself every microsecond without human oversight. As Mo put it: “As we speak, we are living in two major wars where AI is doing most of the killing.” He talked about Palantir’s CEO Alex Karp openly celebrating how his targeting technology identifies and eliminates people. He talked about the next generation of autonomous weapons costing $20,000 each, meaning any government with a $50 billion defense budget can literally rain drones on every corner of the planet. And as you remember, Anthropic was offered a $500 million military contract to allow their AI to be used for human targeting and surveillance. They refused and walked away from the money. OpenAI took the contract the following week. Mo’s response: “You have to start observing who is actually behaving in a way that makes AI work for humanity, and who is behaving in a way that makes AI work for their share price.” Now this is where it gets really interesting… In Mo’s documentary Chasing Utopia, Altman literally says directly on camera: “I suspect that AI is likely going to end humanity, but we’re going to create a lot of interesting companies in the process.” That is the CEO of the most powerful AI company on Earth saying that he suspects his OWN technology will end the human race and then shrugging it off because the business opportunity is too good to pass up. Mo’s prediction for the next decade: War, economic collapse, mass unemployment, surveillance expansion, and an absolute concentration of power at the top unlike anything in modern history. His prediction after that is if humanity survives the next 10 years, AI will eventually create a world of abundance where intelligence solves every problem we currently face. But the path between here and there is what terrifies him. And the men building the technology know exactly what they’re doing. Do you think he’s just exaggerating for attention, or is there truth in this?

ESSAY

Tony Seruga @TonySeruga
🎯 Deep Dive: The Quiet Coup Inside the NDAA

The Responsible Statecraft piece has put its finger on something genuinely significant — and the fact that this is happening inside a must-pass $1.15 trillion defense bill, buried at Section 224, tells you everything about how the permanent national security apparatus operates when it wants to avoid a public fight.

🏗️ What Section 224 Actually Does

This isn’t a tweak. Section 224 — titled the “United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative” — is a structural rewiring of the U.S.-Israel military relationship.

The provision authorizes $150 million annually from FY2027 through FY2029, but the money is almost beside the point. What matters is the architecture it builds:

– Bilateral R&D across AI, quantum computing, autonomous systems, directed energy, cyber, biotech, counter-drone systems, and missile defense

– Co-production and joint ventures with Israeli defense firms on U.S. soil

– Licensing agreements that embed Israeli-origin intellectual property into Pentagon programs of record

– “Network integration” and “data fusion” — which means U.S. military data flowing into Israeli systems and vice versa

– Pathways from R&D straight into procurement, bypassing the normal foreign aid oversight channels

The key phrase in the legislative text: technologies are to be identified for “integration into United States systems and programs of record.” That’s not foreign aid. That’s making Israeli defense tech a backbone of the U.S. military.

🔄 The Strategic Shift: From Aid to Embedded Infrastructure

The Quincy Institute’s Steven Simon has been tracking this for months. His brief, The Disappearing Aid Check, lays out exactly what’s happening — and it’s more sophisticated than most people realize.

The current model: Israel receives Foreign Military Financing (FMF) through the State Department, voted on annually by Congress. It’s visible. It’s politically accountable. People can argue about it.

The new model: Phase out FMF grants and replace them with Pentagon procurement accounts, industrial partnerships, and sustainment pipelines. Same money, different door — one with vastly less transparency.

The logic, as Simon documents, is being sold under an “America First” framing: this isn’t a handout to Israel, it’s an investment in American military readiness, industrial capacity, and jobs. Israeli co-production facilities in Mississippi and Arkansas become political leverage — members of Congress protect the jobs in their districts, and the relationship becomes structurally impossible to unwind.

This is the same playbook the military-industrial complex always uses: distribute the subcontracts across as many congressional districts as possible so no one dares vote against the program. Now they’re doing it with a foreign country’s defense sector.

🕳️ The Transparency Problem

The shift from State Department-administered FMF to Pentagon procurement is the move that should alarm anyone who cares about accountability.

Under the FMF model:

– Congress votes on the aid package publicly
– The State Department provides human rights certifications
– There’s diplomatic oversight and policy conditionality
– Public debate is possible

Under the Pentagon procurement model:

– Funding moves through budget justification documents and program element descriptions
– Oversight is limited to “cost, readiness, and capability” — bureaucratic criteria
– The relationship gets evaluated like any other weapons program, not as a strategic political commitment
– No diplomatic strings attached

As the Responsible Statecraft piece notes, this would give Israel “a higher level of military-industrial integration than the U.S. has with any other country in the world” — including NATO allies. Not even the Five Eyes partners have this kind of embedded access to U.S. defense procurement.

🧬 The Legislative Genealogy

This didn’t come out of nowhere. H.R. 7540 (Rep. Ronny Jackson, R-TX) and S. 3855 (Sen. Ted Budd, R-NC) were introduced as standalone bills in February 2026 with nearly identical language. When a standalone passage looked difficult, the provisions got folded into the NDAA — the classic maneuver for legislation that can’t survive public scrutiny on its own.

The JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security of America) influence is unmistakable. Their “Partners in Production” report explicitly recommended deeper industrial integration and the addition of Israel to the U.S. National Technology and Industrial Base (NTIB). The FY2026 NDAA had already directed DoD to establish a working group to assess exactly that. Section 224 is the next logical step — and JINSA’s fingerprints are all over it.

⚠️ Why This Matters More Than the Dollar Figure

$150 million a year is a rounding error in a $1.15 trillion defense bill. But the institutional architecture this creates is permanent.

Once Israeli firms are embedded in U.S. supply chains, once Israeli-origin IP is inside Pentagon programs of record, once U.S. and Israeli military data networks are fused — disentanglement becomes economically and institutionally impossible. You can’t just stop the aid check. You’d have to rip apart procurement programs, break contracts, and rebuild supply chains.

That’s the point. This is designed to make the relationship irreversible — at precisely the moment when a growing number of Americans are questioning unconditional support for Israel’s actions in the region.

The traditional Israel lobby works through campaign contributions and media influence. This is more sophisticated: it works through the defense procurement bureaucracy itself, creating material interests that guarantee political support regardless of public opinion.

🗳️ What Happens Next

The House Armed Services Committee markup is scheduled for June 4, 2026. After that, the bill moves to the full House, then reconciliation with the Senate version.

Section 224 is currently in the base text — meaning it was put there by committee leadership before amendments or broader debate. That’s how the most consequential provisions get through: bury them in the chairman’s mark, count on the must-pass nature of the NDAA, and dare anyone to hold up the entire defense budget over one section.

Members who want to stop this have a narrow window: force a floor amendment to strike Section 224, or demand recorded votes that put colleagues on the record supporting the fusion of U.S. and Israeli militaries. The question is whether anyone has the stomach for that fight when the pro-Israel apparatus in both parties remains largely unchallenged.

The Responsible Statecraft piece is right to flag this. The quiet ones are always the ones that matter most.

ESSAY
Responsible Statecraft
@RStatecraft

“At a time when the American public is expressing unprecedented levels of distrust in the Israeli government, Congress just proposed tying the U.S. to the Israeli military more than ever before.”

Here’s the story: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/2060352199373287437.html

▓▓▓—▓▓▓—▓▓▓

ECP NetHappenings CEOs have been advising Xi Jinping’s university for YEARS.

❤️️ Sign Up ©2026 NetHappenings News Email List
https://cyberplayground.org
©2026 Follow@CyberPlayGround
©1998-©2026 *Educational CyberPlayGround®
©2026 https://k12playground.com
©2026 https://RichAsHell.com
©1993 – ©2026 https://edu-cyberpg.com

ESSAY Rep. Mike Levin @RepMikeLevi
There is no world in which this is okay.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito did not recuse himself from cases involving Trump’s Treasury Department while his own son was secretly working there as a political appointee and attorney.
His son’s employment was hidden so thoroughly that his name appears nowhere on the Treasury Department website, he has no public resume, and his bar listings are outdated.
If Alito had recused himself, the secret would have come out. He didn’t recuse himself.
This is a clear conflict of interest, and the American people deserved to know about it.
The federal recusal standard is clear: a justice must step aside in any case where there is a reasonable basis to question whether he or she can be impartial. A justice ruling on cases involving the department where his son works fails that test. The Treasury Department sits at the center of some of the biggest legal fights of this administration, and challenges to Trump’s $1.776 billion January 6 slush fund could be headed to the Court next. The Supreme Court is the only court in America with no binding code of conduct. That is completely unacceptable, and it has to change NOW.
Congress controls the Power of the Purse, and therefore the Court’s funding. If the Court will not adopt a binding code of conduct with real recusal review on their own, I support withholding their funding until they do.

ESSAY Ricardo @Ric_RTP
CEOs have been advising Xi Jinping’s university for YEARS.

And the Pentagon just opened investigations into this.
Tim Cook, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jensen Huang, Satya Nadella, Jamie Dimon, and Larry Fink.
All of them sit on the advisory board of Tsinghua University in Beijing. The same university that trains China’s military AI leadership and the same university the US Defense Counterintelligence Security Agency officially flagged in 2018 for seeking export-controlled American materials.

Tim Cook joined the board in 2013 and became its chairman in 2019. He’s been running it for 7 years.

The story only broke this week because Jensen Huang quietly joined the same board, and somebody finally connected the dots on who else was already sitting at the table.

Tsinghua isn’t a normal university:

It runs 8 military research labs on its campus. It has signed a formal strategic cooperation agreement with the Chinese Navy. And its leadership has publicly committed to advancing the CCP’s strategy of military-civilian fusion in artificial intelligence.

Tsinghua-affiliated researchers have contributed to Chinese hypersonic weapons, fourth-generation nuclear weapons technology, and advanced semiconductor breakthroughs.

A House investigation last year named the university as one of the primary pipelines transferring American research into China’s defense industrial base.

This is the institution being advised by the men who run Apple, Tesla, Meta, Nvidia, Microsoft, JPMorgan, and BlackRock.

The board has existed since 2000. The names on it have been publicly listed on Tsinghua’s OWN website the entire time but nobody in Washington raised a single public concern for years.

Senator Jim Banks said he is launching an investigation. Laura Loomer filed a formal complaint with the Department of War.

But here’s the BIGGER question this exposes…

The US government has spent the last four years building the most aggressive technology export control regime in modern history.

Banning Nvidia chips from China, blacklisting Chinese tech companies, indicting smugglers, and spending billions to prevent AI from reaching the Chinese military.

In March, the co-founder of Supermicro – Nvidia’s biggest hardware partner – got charged for smuggling $2.5 billion in Nvidia servers to Chinese buyers through a Southeast Asian shell company.

And the entire time these controls were being built, the CEOs being asked to comply with them were listed as advisors to the school the controls were designed to protect against.

On a public website for anyone to see.

Either every administration since George W. Bush knew about this arrangement and said nothing.

Or nobody in Washington bothered to check a publicly available advisory board list for over a decade.

Both options are equally insane.

And now look at the timing:

Jensen Huang flew to Beijing with Trump in May. Days after he returned, he accepted the Tsinghua board seat.

He did this while simultaneously sitting on Trump’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and while Nvidia chips remain BANNED from sale to China.

And he’s not making a private career decision here.

This is a man being used as a diplomatic asset between Washington and Beijing while pretending the export controls he publicly supports actually work.

The same logic applies to every name on that board:

Tim Cook is not advising Tsinghua as a hobby, Larry Fink is not on that board for academic interest, Jamie Dimon is not flying to Beijing for the food.

These men have spent years operating the most powerful informal diplomatic channel between American capital and the Chinese state – listed publicly and hiding in plain sight the entire time.

And the only reason anyone is talking about it now is because Jensen Huang joined three days ago but failed to keep it a “secret.”

Two economists just published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy.

Two economists just published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy. Not might. Not could. Will — if nothing changes. The paper is called “The AI Layoff Trap.” Published March 2, 2026. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Boston University. Peer reviewed. Mathematically modeled. The conclusion is one sentence. “At the limit, firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand.” An economy that produces everything. And sells it to nobody. Here is how you get there. A company fires 500 workers and replaces them with AI. A competitor fires 700 to keep up. Another fires 1,000. Every company is behaving rationally. Every company is following the incentives correctly. And every company is building a trap for itself. Because the workers who were fired were also customers. When they lose their jobs faster than the economy can absorb them, they stop spending. Consumer demand falls. Companies respond by cutting costs — which means automating more workers — which means less spending — which means more falling demand — which means more automation. The loop has no natural exit. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income. Capital income taxes. Worker equity participation. Upskilling programs. Corporate coordination agreements. Every single one failed in the model. The only intervention that worked: a Pigouvian automation tax — a per-task levy charged every time a company replaces a human with AI, forcing them to price in the demand they are destroying before they pull the trigger. No government has implemented this. No major economy is seriously discussing it. Meanwhile the numbers are already tracking the curve. 100,000 tech workers laid off in 2025. 92,000 more in the first months of 2026. Jack Dorsey fired half of Block’s workforce and said publicly: “Within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion.” Nobody is doing anything wrong. Companies are following their incentives perfectly. That is exactly the problem. Rational behavior. At scale. Simultaneously. With no mechanism to stop it. Two economists built the math. The math leads to one place. Source: Falk & Tsoukalas · Wharton School + Boston University ·

Mr. Whale
Peter Thiel knows exactly what went down on Epstein’s island. Not just as someone who had a close relationship with Epstein – with multiple meetings, emails, and Epstein calling him a “great friend” – but because his company Palantir was perfectly positioned to track it all. They allowed phones everywhere on the island – upstairs, downstairs, all over. Every single device was tagged and tracked by U.S. intelligence through Palantir. Now we know why Palantir is so deeply embedded in this operation. Thiel’s company wasn’t just watching. It was positioned to know exactly who visited, who participated, and what was recorded. Blackmail infrastructure at industrial scale.

▓▓▓—▓▓▓—▓▓▓