ECP NetHappenings TOXIC PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS AND MAKEUP

❤️️ Sign Up ©2026 NetHappenings News Email List
https://cyberplayground.org
©2026 Follow@CyberPlayGround
©1998-©2026 *Educational CyberPlayGround®
©2026 https://k12playground.com
©2026 https://RichAsHell.com
©1993 – ©2026 https://edu-cyberpg.com

Hi Everyone,
I’ve been meaning to send this out for days now.
We all have to check our soap, lotions, and makeup.
Throw out everything that isn’t good for us and buy what is.


TOXIC PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS AND MAKEUP

“Personal care products and cosmetics should be non-toxic for everyone,” Friedman said in a news release https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news-release/2023/10/cosmetics-safety-milestone-california-gov-newsom-approves-ban-26) from the Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit environmental health organization that sponsored the legislation. Banned ingredients — including vinyl acetate, boron substances, certain colors and styrene — are found in at least hundreds of products, according to the Environmental Working Group.
You can view the list of all 50 banned chemicals here (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB496).

Your guide to safer personal care products (https://www.ewg.org/skindeep/)

xoxoxoxox

Educational CyberPlayGround

▓▓▓—▓▓▓—▓▓▓

ECP NetHappenings Trump is Never Leaving

❤️️ Sign Up ©2026 NetHappenings News Email List
https://cyberplayground.org

©2026 Follow@CyberPlayGround
©1998-©2026 *Educational CyberPlayGround®
©2026 https://k12playground.com
©2026 https://RichAsHell.com
©1993 – ©2026 https://edu-cyberpg.com

ECP NetHappenings Newsletter NewsBytes

TRUMP IS NEVER LEAVING

A Trump judicial nominee was asked point blank: is Trump eligible to run for a third term?
Their answer: “I would have to review the actual wording…”
Sen. Chris Coons then asked every nominee in the room to confirm the Constitution bars a third term. Silence.
Every single one of them refused to say it.
Trump is appointing judges who won’t affirm the 22nd Amendment to his face.

TRUMP IS BUILDING THE BUNKER/BALLROOM
@thedreydossier
The anatomy of a… ballroom? Back in October, I started pulling the donor list for Trump’s ‘ballroom’ expecting the usual suspects- luxury brands draining their marketing budgets for a White House photo op But there was no Steinway. No Hermès. No Baccarat. In their place were names like Caterpillar, Booz Allen Hamilton, Blackstone, and Union Pacific. Companies that build classified networks, industrial generators, and military infrastructure. That was the first moment it clicked for me, and I realized I wasn’t looking at a party planning committee. I was looking at a procurement order for a classified data center.

Jim Stewartson @jimstewartson
30 years ago, Elon Musk immigrated to become a parasite on the U.S. economy. We kept rewarding him for his greed—and his impossible stories.
When SpaceX goes IPO, he will to be too big to fail.
He is the poster child for our systemic failure to filter out malignant narcissists.

They call them “data centers”..
Because if they called them mass surveillance centers, people might begin to see what’s going on..
The LARGEST “hyperscale” data center in the world is being proposed in Box Elder County, Utah.
It’s approx. 40,000 acres/62 square miles, backed by Canadian millionaire Kevin O’Leary.

The Epstein files show officials working in sync to apply “clear and specific guidance” on redactions—shielding the names of Trump, former presidents, and a former Secretary of State.
There are millions of files that are still being withheld.

ESSAY

Nav Toor @heynavtoor

If you use TikTok, you should read this once.

In October 2024, a court clerk in Kentucky uploaded the lawsuit against TikTok with the confidential sections still visible. NPR downloaded it before anyone caught the mistake. By the time the court resealed it, the internet had a copy.

What was inside was TikTok’s own engineers, in their own words, describing what their app does to a human brain.

Not a critic’s brain. Yours.

Here is what they wrote down.

— TikTok ran the math on how long it takes to develop “compulsive use” of the app. The number is 260 videos. With 8-second videos played in rapid-fire succession, that works out to roughly 35 minutes. The company’s internal documents call this the compulsive-use threshold.

— TikTok’s own research describes what compulsive use causes: “diminished analytical ability, impaired memory, contextual reasoning, conversational depth, empathy, and heightened anxiety.” That is not a quote from a critic. That is TikTok’s own language, in its own internal documents.

— A team inside the company called “TikTank” wrote in an internal report that compulsive use on the platform was “rampant.”

— After 30 minutes of continuous use in one sitting, the company’s own documents state that users are placed into “filter bubbles” — algorithmic loops the user did not choose and cannot easily escape.

Then there is the screen-time tool — the one TikTok publicly markets as proof it cares.

— TikTok ran an experiment on the 60-minute screen-time prompt. Daily teen usage dropped from 108.5 minutes to 107. A reduction of 1.5 minutes.

— Internally, the screen-time tool was not measured by whether it reduced screen time. Its top success metric, in writing, was “improving public trust in the TikTok platform via media coverage.”

— A project manager wrote in internal chat: “Our goal is not to reduce the time spent.” Another employee added that the goal was “to contribute to daily active users and retention.”

— A TikTok executive approved the screen-time feature only on the condition that its impact on the company’s “core metrics” was minimal. The lawsuit alleges the company planned to “revisit the design” if the tool ever reduced usage by more than 10%.

The “Are you still scrolling?” break videos? An executive admitted in an internal meeting they were “useful talking points” for lawmakers, but “not altogether effective.”

Then there is the algorithm itself.

— An internal report flagged that the For You feed was showing what the company called “a high volume of not attractive subjects.” TikTok then retooled the algorithm to suppress those users. Kentucky authorities wrote: “By changing the TikTok algorithm to show fewer ‘not attractive subjects’ in the For You feed, [TikTok] took active steps to promote a narrow beauty norm even though it could negatively impact their Young Users.”

That sentence is the entire pitch of the platform, said out loud.

— Internally, TikTok also acknowledged that its publicly reported content moderation metrics were “mostly misleading,” because they only measured the content the company successfully moderated — never the content it missed.

Now read those bullet points again as one continuous case.

The company knows the addiction threshold. The company measured it. The company ranked engagement over mental health in writing. The company built a screen-time tool whose internal success metric was PR. The company suppressed people it deemed unattractive to keep you scrolling. The company called its own moderation numbers misleading.

None of this is a leaked rumor. None of this is a journalist’s interpretation. This is a court filing. The documents are TikTok’s. The words are TikTok’s. The math is TikTok’s.

The 14 state attorneys general who signed onto this lawsuit aren’t fringe activists. They’re a bipartisan coalition.

Sources at the bottom: NPR, CNN, AP, Mashable, OPB, The Independent. All citing the same accidentally-unsealed Kentucky filing from October 11, 2024.

The next time the company tells you it cares about your wellbeing — the screen-time prompts, the break videos, the safety features, the careful PR statements — remember that its own engineers wrote down, in court-admissible language, that the safeguards were never meant to work.

The app is not broken.

It is performing exactly as designed.

You were the spec.

▓▓▓—▓▓▓—▓▓▓

ECP NetHappenings Free AI curriculum

❤️️ Sign Up ©2026 NetHappenings News Email List
https://cyberplayground.org

©2026 Follow@CyberPlayGround
©1998-©2026 *Educational CyberPlayGround®
©2026 https://k12playground.com
©2026 https://RichAsHell.com
©1993 – ©2026 https://edu-cyberpg.com

MIT just quietly dropped a free AI curriculum that puts $50,000 university courses to shame.

12 books.

Zero tuition.

From the same institution that produced the people building the models everyone is talking about.

FOUNDATIONS

1. Foundations of Machine Learning — https://cs.nyu.edu/~mohri/mlbook/
2. Understanding Deep Learning — https://udlbook.github.io/udlbook/
3. Machine Learning Systems — https://mlsysbook.ai/assets/downloads/Machine-Learning-Systems.pdf

ADVANCED TECHNIQUES

4. Algorithms for ML — http://algorithmsbook.com
5. Deep Learning —  https://mlsysbook.ai/tinytorch/

REINFORCEMENT LEARNING

6. RL Basics (Sutton & Barto) — https://www.andrew.cmu.edu/course/10-703/textbook/BartoSutton.pdf
7. Distributional RL — url+token
8. Multi-Agent Systems — http://marl-book.com
9. Long Game AI — url +token

ETHICS & PROBABILITY

10. Fairness in ML — http://fairmlbook.org
11. Probabilistic ML Part 1 — https://probml.github.io/pml-book/book1.html
12. Probabilistic ML Part 2 — https://probml.github.io/pml-book/book1.html

This is a complete MIT-level AI education.

Not a YouTube playlist.

Not a Twitter thread full of fluff.

Textbooks written by the researchers who built the field.

The people who actually study this will not just understand AI better than their peers.

They will understand it better than most people currently getting paid to work in it.

Most people will bookmark this and never open it.

The ones who open it tonight are the ones who show up in 12 months having built something nobody around them understands yet.

Bookmark this.

Open the first one tonight.

Follow @cyrilXBT for more resources that actually compound.

▓▓—▓▓▓—▓▓▓

ECP NetHappenings Ethereum’s Largest Whales

❤️️ Sign Up ©2026 NetHappenings News Email List
https://cyberplayground.org

©2026 Follow@CyberPlayGround
©1998-©2026 *Educational CyberPlayGround®
©2026 https://k12playground.com
©2026 https://RichAsHell.com
©1993 – ©2026 https://edu-cyberpg.com

 

Tyler Reed – TruthLabs 🫡
@BoringSleuth
Ethereum’s largest whales who purchased the ETH ICO in 2014, used Bitcoin sent from Silk Road addresses directly connected to corrupt & convicted FBI Agents, Ross Ulbricht’s own seized Silk Road address’, the Ethereum Foundations Bitcoin address used before their ICO, and the corrupt MyEtherWallet Developer Cabo setup The Dao contract that was exploited due to faulty code at line 666.

I included some of the fund tracing on Bitcoin in the image below.

In 2025, Ross was released from prison after almost serving a decade behind bars. Yesterday Ross received a 300 BTC donation valued at $31 Million.

The untraced BTC that left the corrupt agents wallets from the Baltimore Task Force eventually became the main funder of the ETH ICO, and washed further into 100’s if not 1,000’s of other ICO’s occurring on Ethereum since 2015.

It’s difficult to portray the implications of a history that goes so deep.
https://x.com/BoringSleuth/status/1929284512749392024/photo/1

Vitalik, your ICO, and your Foundations own BTC wallets were funded from Bitcoin that came from @RealRossU seized Silk Road wallet address’.

It was Ross’ demise that funded the Ethereum Foundation, and purchased out the majority of your entire ICO. The literal Foundation of your entire Empire was founded because Ross went to prison. You knew this BTC was coming and your ICO raise was going to be successful in January 2014, 7 months prior, because it was this Bitcoin that would be used (along with Mt. Gox) to fund you.

Yet you @VitalikButerin let poor people fund movements like Free Ross Dao while sitting on your hands and occasionally tweeting when the entire movement should have been led and entirely funded by YOU.

You are a stain on the word Integrity and a Snake that of which would make the Devil himself proud.
https://x.com/BoringSleuth/status/1881175747856912653

ECP NetHappenings Trump pardoned Ross Ulbricht

▓▓▓—▓▓▓—▓▓▓