©1998 *Educational CyberPlayGround®
https://edu-cyberpg.com
Sign Up NetHappenings Blog News Headlines Email List
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ©ECP NetHappenings Blog https://cyberplayground.org
Follow Twitter @CyberPlayGround
©1993 https://k12playground.com
© https://RichAsHell.com
USVI — Plaskett Seeks to Sanction Jane Doe Attorney for ‘Frivolous’ Epstein Suit
https://stthomassource.com/content/2024/07/06/plaskett-seeks-sanctions-against-jane-doe-attorney-for-frivolous-epstein-suit/
Merson indicated he would consider withdrawing the allegations against Plaskett if given access to her deposition in the V.I. government’s complaint against J.P. Morgan Chase, Epstein’s bank, which was settled for $75 million in September. (Merson has been stymied in his efforts to get documents in that case that were filed under protective order. Last month, Judge Jed Rakoff denied his request.)
The lawsuit by Jane Doe 1-6 alleges negligence and violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, claiming territory officials actively conspired with Epstein to perpetuate his sex-trafficking scheme for their own gain.
Also named in the complaint in both their professional and personal capacities are former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, former Senators Celestino White and Carlton Dowe, who now heads the V.I. Port Authority, former Attorney General Vincent Frazer, and former Governors Kenneth Mapp and John de Jongh Jr. All have denied wrongdoing, and all have sought to have the complaint dismissed. In its latest filing on Wednesday, the V.I. Justice Department said the “allegations and lawsuit have no merit.”
TRUMP Child Molester / Rapist / Convicted Felon
Who Is U.S.V.I.
Representative
Stacey Plaskett?
She assumed office January 3, 2015. Plaskett was born on May 13, 1966 in Brooklyn, New York. Her parents are both from Saint Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands.
SEP Committee & Subcommittee Assignments – 118th Congress
* House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government
*House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
*Subcommittee on National Intelligence Enterprise ( Ranking Member)
*Subcommittee on Defense Intelligence and Overhead Architecture
Rep. Stacey Plaskett @StaceyPlaskett
Jul 4 Trump v US
(SCOTUS Presidential Immunity) is Dred Scott of the 21st Century
-overreach
-tortured analysis of constitution
-break with precedent
-activist court
-assist to the economic elite
They have taken sides in the civil war
SCOTUS decision in Trump v. US (Presidential immunity case) is the SCOTUS Dred Scott v Emerson (black humanity/citizenship case) of the 21 Century and should call us to activism.
Dred Scott ruled unconstitutional Congress’ attempt at a middle ground on the slavery issue with the Missouri Compromise. Taney’s court was determined to continue to give the Southern landowning elite the economic upper hand gained through the enslavement of African Americans.
Rep. Stacey Plaskett @StaceyPlaskett Jul 4 2024
SCOTUS decision in Trump v. US (Presidential immunity case) is the SCOTUS Dred Scott v Emerson (black humanity/citizenship case) of the 21 Century and should call us to activism
Dred Scott -a tortured, poorly written, ignoring history and precedent decision by an activist SCOTUS (sound familiar). It ignored constitutional precedence and logic to reach a point. CJ Taney imposed judicial decision, remove congressional power to give the South pre- eminence
Dred Scott ruled unconstitutional Congress’ attempt at a middle ground on the slavery issue with the Missouri Compromise. Taney’s court was determined to continue to give the Southern landowning elite the economic upper hand gained through the enslavement of African Americans.
Like todays corporate 1%, fear and envy kept many middle lower class Southerners (whites) convinced preserving this was in their self interest (sound familiar)
The decision was a catalyst in the North uniting northern merchants, abolitionist, politicians and those heading west
Many believe this was a final straw to bring about the Civil War
Trumps immunity decision is a SCOTUS overreach of authority for the judiciary and the presidency relegating the people’s representative branch – the Congress a distant third.
We have an activist SCOTUS much like the pre-war SCOTUS supporting not just Trump but an elite oligarchy and Christian Nationalism at the expense of the masses
Chief Justice Robert’s grant of unfettered authority to POTUS – should Trump win – makes PROJECT 2025 a finality. SCOTUS decision should unite us and call us to FIGHT – ORGANIZE, ACTIVATE, VOTE and stop the bullshyte
–//–
Chief Justice John Roberts at his confirmation hearing: “No one is above the law under our system and that includes the president. The president is fully bound by the law.” (Sept. 2005)
▓▓▓—▓▓▓—▓▓▓—▓▓▓—▓▓▓—▓▓▓