Under the Law of Piracy Impeach and REMOVE Trump Now!
Pentagon confirms $35 million in aid still being withheld from Ukraine despite impeachment inquiry
https://www.salon.com/2019/11/20/pentagon-confirms-35-million-in-aid-still-being-withheld-from-ukraine-despite-impeachment-inquiry/
Trump and All the Presidents Men fill the prisons because they are pirates and smugglers who have committed treasonous crimes against humanity. They should be sentenced to death by hanging.
The First Amendment exists to protect honest information that the government prefers citizens not know.
Laws Of The Sea
These traitors should be tried under Piracy Law. They collaborated with Cambridge Analytica, and Facebook, Zuckerberg to interfer with elections in America and England according to international law.
The “Piracy Analogy” that States may exercise universal jurisdiction in cases of piracy is an undisputed norm of international law. It is written into the 1984 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Article 105) and is generally accepted as being an entitlement under customary international law. They didn’t commit treason in ships at sea, but with machines and cable wiring in the oceans.
Our vote, is our own property, our rights are unalienable before government’s rights ~ John Locke
We The People control the law, the Grand Jury, and the Trial Jury were all put in the system as separate powers, they are the check against all the others. The Trial Check is the most important check and the final check in the system of checks and balances.
The jury’s vote is the most important check against bad laws of politicians, and judges who have been corrupted.
https://edu-cyberpg.com/Music/Jury_Nullifation_Rights.html
The Senate owes their allegience to the COUNTRY the USA not the office or a person.
THOMAS JEFFERSON (1789): I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.
JOHN ADAMS (1771): It’s not only ….(the juror’s) right, but his duty, in that case, to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgement, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.
JOHN JAY (1794): The jury has a right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy.
ALEXANDER HAMILTON (1804): Jurors should acquit even against the judge’s instruction….”if exercising their judgement with discretion and honesty they have a clear conviction that the charge of the court is wrong.”
SAMUEL CHASE (1804): The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts.
OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES (1920): The jury has the power to bring a verdict in the teeth of both the law and the facts.
Justice BYRON WHITE (Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 US 145, 156 (1968)): “Those who wrote our constitutions knew from history and experience that it was necessary to protect against unfounded criminal charges brought to eliminate enemies and against judges too responsive to the voice of higher authority.”
Separation of church and state in the United States
The Family – Hiding in Plain Sight:
The National Prayer Breakfast: Jesus is the Answer to Rethuglican power. It’s ok to lie, and betray the constitution cause you have been appointed by god as the chosen one. A breath taking assessment of the
“Fox+Friends preview an interview with Rick Perry, where he says that Trump is “the chosen one” and “sent by God to do great things” Pete Hegseth: “God has used imperfect people forever,” but what Trump “has withstood is unlike what really any other mortal could understand”.
https://twitter.com/CourtneyHagle/status/1198654816928579584
Protect Democracy
HISTORIANS’ STATEMENT ON THE IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT TRUMP
LYSANDER SPOONER (An Essay on the Trial by Jury, 1852, p. 11): “For more than six hundred years–that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215, there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.”
HGW: “If the meaning of the law is not a fact, what is it? Is it just an opinion? When the Trial Judge proclaims the law to the jury, he declares it to be a fact of law. But it is just one more ‘fact’ to be submitted to the jury for confirmation or rejection. They alone have the right to determine whether the judge’s opinion is, indeed, a ‘fact.'”
WILLIAM KUNSTLER (quoted in Franklin M. Nugent, “Jury Power: Secret Weapon Against Bad Law,” revised from Youth Connection, 1988): “Unless the jury can exercise its community conscience role, our judicial system will have become so inflexible that the effect may well be a progressive radicalization of protest into channels that will threaten the very continuance of the system itself. To put it another way, the jury is…the safety valve that must exist if this society is to be able to accommodate its own internal stresses and strains…[I]f the community is to sit in the jury box, its decision cannot be legally limited to a conscience-less application of fact to law.”
“You know you love your country. You love it…..
You know you love the country, you just can’t stand the government – get it straight.
Mark Twain said; “Loyalty to the country always, Loyalty to the government when it deserves it.” It is an essential distinction you are neglecting.”
Are you tough enough, strong enough. Get it straight.
In 1670, it was declared illegal to hold a religious gathering or preach a sermon in England which was not a “Church of England” sermon. Dissident churches, including the Quaker meeting houses, were closed.
Unable to get into his London meeting house, William Penn led a Quaker meeting in the street outside. He was arrested and put on trial on Sept. 5, 1670. The judges explained to the jury that preaching a nonconformist sermon was illegal, and Penn had been caught doing just that. They instructed the jury to convict.
The jury asked to be read the wording of the law Penn was said to have violated. The judges told them they didn’t need to and were INSTRUCTED “take the law as we give it to you”. The jury said if they couldn’t see the law, they weren’t going to convict. THE JURY UNANIMOUSLY ACQUITTED WILLIAM PENN, who was free to emigrate to America.
The case went to the highest court in the land. England’s Court of Common Pleas ruled the jury was right — they were under obligation to follow no one’s orders as to what verdict they could reach.
Juries were and remain to this day free to vote their conscience, even in direct contravention of the instructions of the judge; they cannot be punished for doing so.
In the U.S. the precedent was upheld in the case of John Peter Zenger, charged in 1735 with libeling the king. British law did not allow “truth” as a defense. If you published a criticism of the king, that was criminal libel. Zenger admitted he’d printed the pamphlet, and everyone could see it was critical of the king. The court therefore instructed the jury to convict.
The American jury WOULD NOT DO IT only confirming American jury rights, giving us “Freedom of the Press.”
https://edu-cyberpg.com/Music/Jury_Nullifation_Rights.html
How the 1% Scrubs Its Image Online
Prominent figures from Jacob Gottlieb to Betsy DeVos got help from a reputation management firm that can bury image-sensitive Google results by placing flattering content on websites that masquerade as news outlets
https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-the-1-scrubs-its-image-online-11576233000
Facebook Ads Can Still Discriminate Against Women and Older Workers Despite a Civil Rights Settlement
New research and Facebook’s own ad archive show that the company’s new system to ensure diverse audiences for housing and employment ads has many of the same problems as its predecessor.
https://www.propublica.org/article/facebook-ads-can-still-discriminate-against-women-and-older-workers-despite-a-civil-rights-settlement
Thief Stole Payroll Data for Thousands of Facebook Employees
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-13/thief-stole-payroll-data-for-thousands-of-facebook-employees Facebook’s new efforts to apply radical transparency to the personal information of their employees, as they have done in the past for their users.Just like your circles of friends, browsing activity, unsent messages, sexual orientation, credit card purchases, webcams, microphones, address books, and geographic location, your banking records want to be free! The only people who can be harmed by such honesty are those with something to hide, after all- and surely none of you have something to hide?
In an email, Facebook encouraged employees to notify their banks and offered them a two-year subscription to an identity theft monitoring service.
The Russian Federation, as well as organizations, individuals and UK-based entities, attempted to influence the British election by spreading disinformation to alter voter perceptions of the candidates.
https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-the-use-of-disinformation-in-the-british-election/
How Cambridge Analytica got away with it Investigate Facebook
Senior execs from Trump’s election consultants Cambridge Analytica caught on film.
Bloomberg Just Bought CityLab—and Put Half Its Reporters Out of a Job
As part of the sale, the Atlantic is making layoffs.
https://www.motherjones.com/media/2019/12/bloomberg-just-bought-citylab-and-put-half-its-reporters-out-of-a-job/