Olympics

The Economist, have been intrigued by the business aspects of the Games. There is an interesting hierarchy of sponsors. Organizers not willing to pay for play

Olympics

As the Summer Olympics begin in London, there is some well-founded
anxiety about the long-term benefits of hosting such a grand venture
Business and the Olympics: Victors and spoils
http://www.economist.com/node/21559326
London Olympics: Are organizers not willing to pay for play?
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/music/posts/la-et-ms-0724-olympics-
music-20120724,0,4734546.story
Why The Olympics Aren’t Good For Us, And How They Can Be
http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/24/opinion/opinion-olympics-future-
perryman/index.html
BBC Sport: Olympics
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/olympics/2012/
London 2012
http://www.olympic.org/london-2012-summer-olympics
Opening Ceremony of 1948 London Olympics
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13391235
This Friday, the Olympics will return to London for the first time since
1948, and the entire world will be watching. This major sporting event
itself will be closely watched by the usual suspects (sports media, pundits,
and the like), but urban studies types will be most interested in watching
after the fact to see how the infrastructure improvements created for the
Olympics hold up over time. A number of commentators, including the folks at
The Economist, have been intrigued by the business aspects of the Games. In
an article in this week’s edition, they reported that the British
government’s budget for the games is around $14.5 billion. In addition, the
International Olympic Committee has raised $4.87 billion in broadcast fees
for the Olympic cycle that includes the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver,
B.C. They also noted that there is an interesting hierarchy of sponsors. And
what of the broad benefits that might accrue to the host country? The
findings are mixed: Victor Matheson of the College of the Holy Cross noted
that organizers of big sporting events tend to overestimate the benefits and
underestimate the costs. Illustrating this point, noted academics Bent
Flyvbjerg and Allison Stewart of Oxford University recently released a
working paper noting that every Olympiad since 1960 has gone over budget.
This may increase anxiety for the average Briton. [KMG]
The first link leads to The Economist article which offers a cost-benefit
analysis of hosting the London Summer Olympics. The second link will take
users to a piece from the Los Angeles Times about the pay scale for major
pop music acts that will be appearing at the Games. Moving along, the third
link will whisk visitors to a nice editorial piece by Mark Perryman on how
the Olympics could be improved the next go-round. The fourth link will lead
interested parties to the BBC’s site dedicated to coverage of the Summer
Olympics. The fifth link will take guests to the official London Summer
Olympics, complete with detailed schedule, venue information, and video
clips. The last link leads to a wonderful newsreel of the opening ceremonies
of the 1948 Olympic Games, which were also held in London.
Victor Matheson of the College of the Holy Cross

One thought on “Olympics”

  1. Spot on with this write-up, I truly think this web site wants far more consideration. I’ll probably be once more to read much more, thanks for that info.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *