Surveillance Tech from EFF | Electronic Frontier Foundation

From Camera Towers to Spy Blimps, Border Researchers Now Can Use 65+ Open-licensed Images of Surveillance Tech from EFF | Electronic Frontier Foundation

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/11/eff-releases-images-surveillance-us-mexico-border-under-creative-commons

From Camera Towers to Spy Blimps, Border Researchers Now Can Use 65+ Open-licensed Images of Surveillance Tech from EFF

The U.S.-Mexico border is one of the most politicized technological spaces in the country, with leaders in both political parties supporting massive spending on border security and the so-called “Virtual Wall.” Yet we see little debate over the negative impacts for human rights or the civil liberties of those who live in the borderlands. Despite all the political and media attention devoted to the border, most people hoping to write about, research, or learn how to identify the myriad technologies situated have to rely on images released selectively by Customs & Border Protection, copyright-restricted photographs taken by corporate press outlets or promotional advertisements from the vendors themselves.

To address this information gap, EFF is releasing a series of images taken along the U.S. Mexico-Border in California, Arizona, and New Mexico under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license, which means they are free to use, so long as credit is given to EFF (see EFF’s Copyright policy <https://www.eff.org/copyright>). Our goal is not only to ensure there are alternative and open sources of visual information to inform discourse, but to raise awareness of how surveillance is impacting communities along the border and the hundreds of millions of dollars being sunk into oppressive surveillance technologies.

*Surveillance Towers*

The images include various types of surveillance towers adopted by Customs & Border Protection over the last two decades:

1. Integrated Fixed Towers (IFT). These structures are from the
vendor Elbit Systems of America, part of an Israeli corporation
that has come under criticism for its role in surveillance in
Palestine
<https://theintercept.com/2019/08/25/border-patrol-israel-elbit-surveillance/>.
Some IFT towers are built using the same infrastructure
<https://www.defensedaily.com/cbp-deploys-additional-sensor-towers-replace-legacy-sbinet-systems-2/homeland-security/>as the earlier Secure Border Initiative
<https://www.politico.com/story/2011/01/dhs-cancels-virtual-border-fence-047625>(SBInet) program, which was widely considered a multi-billion-dollar boondoggle and canceled in January 2011. While there may be different IFT models along the border, the most common versions combine electro-optical and infrared sensors and radar and use solar panels.
2. Remote Video Surveillance Systems (RVSS). These structures from the vendor General Dynamics are most commonly, but not
exclusively, found along the border fence. The platform at the top
usually includes two sensor rigs with electro-optical and infrared
cameras and a laser illuminator. The RVSS towers along the
southwestern border (California, Arizona, New Mexico, and the El
Paso area in Texas) differ in design than some of the RVSS models
in south Texas; those are not included in this photo collection.
3. Autonomous Surveillance Towers (AST). These “Sentry” towers are made by Anduril Industries, founded by Oculus-creator Palmer Luckey. According to CBP
<https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/national-media-release/cbp-s-autonomous-surveillance-towers-declared-program-record-along>, an AST “scans the environment with radar to detect movement, orients a camera to the location of the movement detected by the radar, and analyzes the imagery using algorithms to autonomously identify items of interest.” In July 2020, CBP announced plans to acquire a total of 200 of these systems by the end of Fiscal Year 2022, a deal worth $250 million.
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/03/11/mexico-border-surveillance-towers/>EFF
is publishing an image of one of these new towers installed in New
Mexico along State Road 9; previously Anduril towers were only
known to be located in Southern California and South Texas.
4. Mobile Surveillance Capabilities (MSC) from the vendor FLIR, which are surveillance towers mounted in the back of trucks so that they can be transported around or parked semi-permanently at particular locations. While CBP has used these trucks for many years, inearly 2021 FLIR announced
<https://www.flir.com/news-center/military/flir-wins-awards-worth-up-to-$23m-from-us-customs-and-border-protection-for-improved-ground-and-air-surveillance-capabilities/> a
new $21 million contract with CBP that will include additional
units with new technologies “that can track up to 500 objects at
once at ranges greater than 10 miles.” While these trucks do move
around the region, they are often parked in certain established
areas, including next to permanent surveillance towers.

CBP is currently in the early stages of the solicitation process for a massive expansion of this tower network on both the southern and northern border, according to an industry presentation <https://www.defensedaily.com/cbp-deploys-additional-sensor-towers-replace-legacy-sbinet-systems-2/homeland-security/> from October. The “Integrated Surveillance Tower (IST) program is designed to “consolidate disparate surveillance tower systems under a single unified program structure and set of contracts,” but it also contemplates upgrading 172 current RVSS towers and then adding 336 more, with the majority in California and Texas.

*Tactical Aerostats*

EFF’s image set also includes two new tactical aerostats. First, the persistent ground surveillance (PGSS) tactical aerostat that was launched without notice over the summer in Nogales, AZ, surprising and angering the local community. Secondly, we photographed a new aerostat in southern New Mexico that had not been previously reported. A third aerostat will soon be launched in Sasabe, AZ-with a total of 17 planned in the next fiscal year, according to a CBP report <https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/local-media-release/cbp-deploy-aerostat-nogales>. These aerostats should not be confused with the “Tethered Aerostat Radar Systems,” which are larger and permanently moored at air fields throughout the southern U.S. and Puerto Rico. TARS primarily use radar, while tactical aerostats include “day and night cameras to provide persistent, low-altitude surveillance, with a maximum range of 3,000 feet above ground level,” CBP says. Tactical aerostats are tethered to trailer-like platforms that can be moved to other locations within a Border Patrol’s area of responsibility.

*EFF and the Border*

EFF’s photographs were gathered up close when possible, and using a long-range lens when not, by EFF staff during two trips to the U.S.-Mexico border. In addition to capturing these images, EFF met with the residents, activists, humanitarian organizations, law enforcement officials, and journalists whose work is directly impacted by the expansion of surveillance technology in their communities.

While officials in Washington, DC and state capitals talk in abstract and hyperbolic terms about a “virtual wall,” there is nothing virtual at all about the surveillance for the people who live there. The towers break up the horizon and loom over their backyards. They can see the aerostats from the windows of their homes. This surveillance tech watches not just the border, and people crossing it, but also nearby towns and communities, on both sides, from air and the ground, and it can track them for miles, whether they’re hiking, driving to visit relatives, or just minding their own business in solitude.

People who live, work, and cross the border have rights. We hope these photographs document the degree to which freedoms and privacy have been curtailed for people in the borderlands.

A sample of the images is below. You can find the entire annotated collection here. <https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=EFF+Border+Trip+Surveillance+Photos&title=Special:MediaSearch&go=Go&type=image>

An Anduril Sentry off CA-98 in Imperial County, CA

A Tactical Aerostat flying over State Road 9, Luna County, NM

An extreme close-up shot of the lens of an Integrated Fixed Tower (IFT) camera on Coronado Peak, Cochise County, AZ

A Mobile Surveillance Capability surveillance device atop a truck in Pima County, AZ

A Mobile Surveillance Capability surveillance in Pima County, AZ

ACLU sues Homeland Security over ‘stingray’ cell phone surveillance

ACLU sues Homeland Security over ‘stingray’ cell phone surveillance

ACLU sues Homeland Security over ‘stingray’ cell phone surveillance
The American Civil Liberties Union filed suit against Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in federal court on Wednesday after the organization claimed the agencies “failed to produce records” relating to cell site simulators — or “stingrays.”
https://techcrunch.com/2019/12/11/aclu-cbp-ice-stingray-surveillance/

The Third Pary doctrine allows the Government to end run the 4th amendment if you disclosed info to a 3rd party. In this instance, the government is claiming they do not have to talk about the technology at all, even to the point of proving it actually does what they claim.

Hopefully the ACLU can put a end to that, the government should not be able to contract with any organization that prevents them from disclosing their activity to the public. Seems law enforcement has lost sight of who they answer to, which should be the people of this nation.

There are companies that specialize in ad-hoc towers to provide service. Example: Mobilitie in Chicago. Very important piece of mobile data infrastructure, but a rogue tower is still a real security risk. AIMSICD is an Android app to detect IMSI-Catchers. These devices are false mobile towers (base stations) acting between the target mobile phone(s) and the real towers of service providers. As such they are considered a Man-In-The-Middle (MITM) attack. This surveillance technology is also known as “StingRay”,Cellular Interception” and alike.
https://cellularprivacy.github.io/Android-IMSI-Catcher-Detector/

Those ‘stingray’ detector apps are basically useless, say researchers.
Researchers found at least one major flaw in the five leading stingray surveillance trackers for Android.
https://www.zdnet.com/article/stingray-detector-apps-andorid-basically-useless-research/

Antenna Structure Registration (ASR) – Overview
https://www.fcc.gov/wireless/support/antenna-structure-registration-asr-resources/antenna-structure-registration-asr

Tower data is public record.
Search aggregator: http://www.antennasearch.com

[0] What is OpenCelliD?
https://opencellid.org/
OpenCellID and MLS contributor’s app
https://github.com/zamojski/TowerCollector/

[1] https://github.com/zamojski/TowerCollector/

[2] https://location.services.mozilla.com/

[3] https://www.wigle.net/

Search for Cell Towers http://www.cellreception.com/towers/

We can have E2E encryption on cellphones today, just make calls and send texts over Signal (with other people who also have Signal installed).
Here’s an article on using SIM cards as a secure element https://nelenkov.blogspot.com/2013/09/using-sim-card-as-secure-element.html

American carriers who care about preventing government spying go to jail.
The CEO of Qwest
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2013/09/30/a-ceo-who-resisted-nsa-spying-is-out-of-prison-and-he-feels-vindicated-by-snowden-leaks/
comment “The way that Qwest CEO Joseph Nacchio so meaningfully resisted the government that he was convicted of insider trading for telling people his company would be successful when it actually relied on a government contract that was pulled in retaliation, which he couldn’t use as a defense in court because of national security concerns? For which he served four years in prison, and Qwest no longer exists? That sort of meaningfully resist? The message to me from that case is clear—if the US government tells you to jump, you answer, how high.”