As coronavirus sweeps the globe, there is not a single Trilogy Evo Universal ventilator — developed with government funds — in the U.S. stockpile. Meanwhile, Royal Philips N.V. has sold higher-priced versions to clients around the world.
ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published.
F^^K Royal Philips N.V.
Five years ago, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services tried to plug a crucial hole in its preparations for a global pandemic, signing a $13.8 million contract with a Pennsylvania manufacturer to create a low-cost, portable, easy-to-use ventilator that could be stockpiled for emergencies.
This past September, with the design of the new Trilogy Evo Universal finally cleared by the Food and Drug Administration, HHS ordered 10,000 of the ventilators for the Strategic National Stockpile at a cost of $3,280 each. But as the pandemic continues to spread across the globe, there is still not a single Trilogy Evo Universal in the stockpile.
Instead last summer, soon after the FDA’s approval, the Pennsylvania company that designed the device — a subsidiary of the Dutch appliance and technology giant Royal Philips N.V. — began selling two higher-priced commercial versions of the same ventilator around the world.
“We sell to whoever calls,” said a saleswoman at a small medical-supply company on Staten Island that bought 50 Trilogy Evo ventilators from Royal Philips N.V. in early March and last week hiked its online price from $12,495 to $17,154. “We have hundreds of orders to fill. I think America didn’t take this seriously at first, and now everyone’s frantic.”
Philips had agreed to make the Trilogy Evo Universal ventilator “as soon as possible.” However, a Philips spokesman said the company has no plan to even begin production anytime this year.
Software defect in the TrilogyEVO and TrilogyEVOUniversal Ventilator, versions SW 1.00.05, SW 1.01.09.00, SW 1.01.10.00, and SW 1.01.11.00, causing inoperative and loss of all power alarms. This defect causes an incorrect or unexpected result failing requirements TSRS1298 and PRD439. FDA Determined
The administration was supposed to announce a deal to produce 80,000 ventilators on Wednesday. Now Trump’s backing off. Trump suddenly halted plans to have GM retool a plant to produce as many as 80,000 ventilators.
In 2006, the Department of Health and Human Services established a new division, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, with a mandate to prepare medical responses to chemical, biological and nuclear attacks as well as infectious diseases.
In its first year in operation, the research agency considered how to expand the number of ventilators. It estimated that an additional 70,000 machines would be required in a moderate influenza pandemic.
“Companies are doing their best to be profitable, but it can mean trillions of dollars of damage to economies, and many people dying. Governments are meant to step up in these situations.
Roche uses vendor locking in or legal lock ins (Denmark) to keep countries from running any tests.
This is not a matter of ramping up production in January ex-ante. It’s a thing that happened and was discussed just last week, when many EU countries literally were in a state of emergency since more than a week. In an effort to protect future, not current, profits, Roche has more or less directly contributed to the death of people. And if you think this is a strategic decisions that firms should be able to make in such a volatile situation, then you should probably not be allowed to gain these kinds of market shares in the EU.
Because let’s be clear. If there were a legal institution to solve this problem last week or two weeks ago, it would have been used. The only reason Roche responds now is because the EC would invoke its discretionary power, slow as it is.
The only ethical decision for Roche would have been to release either the recipe or release legal lock-ins as soon as it was apparent that they could not fulfill orders in time. Roche, which is not a EU company, should be held accountable to whatever degree the law allows. And to the degree it doesn’t, such laws should be created.
From a EU perspective, it is doubtful whether a company that acts in this way should be allowed to do business here in this manner – in my personal opinion. And that’s not just empty talk – in several countries the constitutions actually do norm that lives and welfare of people take precedence over pecuniary interests. For example, Roche would have simply have been disowned of their intellectual property by a court here in Germany if we would have had the same lock-in issue. There’s ample legal precedent for that, and there are high legal boundaries for such actions. But given the setup of our constitution, these requirements are clearly met in this case.”
3/27/2020 Pharmaceutical company Roche announced Friday afternoon that it will release the recipe for its lysis buffer if Dutch laboratories ask for it.
Earlier today Follow the Money revealed that the European Commission was exploring options for an intervention in pharmaceutical company Roche, instigated by the possible abuse by Roche of its position of power on the coronavirus testmarket. Below you find the article that prompted Roche to release its recipe. Ask for #RocheLyrisBuffer
Pharmaceutical company #Roche has come under severe criticism due to the limited capability for coronavirus testing in the Netherlands. The majority of laboratories in the Netherlands depends on Roche test kits and machines, while the company is only able to supply 30 per cent of the outstanding orders. According to the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu – RIVM), the company has also refused to release the recipe for a solution – so-called lysis buffer – which is needed for the tests. An investigation by Follow the Money (FTM), which was published yesterday, revealed that Roche is withholding this recipe. With the recipe, labs would be able to quickly make their own solution and ramp up their testing capability.
These findings prompted officials of the European Commission (EC) to contact FTM. They indicated that the EC is keeping its ‘eyes and ears wide open’. The EC has launched a preliminary investigation into the position of power Roche has on the Dutch market and is reviewing a possible abuse of the company’s dominant economic position. The Netherlands Authority for Consumers & Markets(Autoriteit Consument en Markt – ACM) confirms that it too is keeping tabs on the case.
Should the EC or ACM decide to step in, they could take steps in the form of ‘interim measures’, such as forcing Roche to provide supplies. The officials state that the issue is being handled with the necessary urgency. They say that the EC could act ‘fast’. ‘The Commissioner [for Competition – eds.] also supports swift action.’
According to the EC, it will contact the ACM very soon. Although in principle the ACM is authorised to take measures, the EC will possibly also take steps of its own. The first step would probably be sending a letter to Roche to increase pressure on the company. Should that not have the desired effect, formal measures may follow.
Sparing use of testing capability
It is noteworthy that earlier this week Roche called on governments and health organisations to make sparing use of their testing capability. This is the only way to ensure the adequate supply of sufficient testing materials, according to the Swiss company. This appeal goes against the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO), which last week urged governments to test as widely as possible. It is the only way to curb the spread of the disease, according to the WHO.
Meanwhile, Roche has concluded deals for the delivery of testing materials with the United States, among other countries, which in the praising words of President Trump has greatly expanded the testing capability – 1.4 million in the short term, possibly 5 million later on. It is unclear how the company distributes its products among its clients around the globe.
Against this backdrop, the EC officials noted with astonishment that Roche plays a defining role in defining the Dutch testing policy. This is because Roche has provided the chairperson of trade association Diagned – Barbara Kamp – in which capacity she has joined a specially established Diagnostics Task Force, together with the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, the RIVM and other parties. The task force is studying ways to combat the testing shortages. This raises the question of whether Roche is also promoting its own interests on the task force.
FTM asked the RIVM why the industry is represented on the task force and what influence it could exert on the testing policy. ‘It makes sense to involve suppliers in the meetings,’ a spokesperson informed us. ‘But the Outbreak Management Team (OMT) provides recommendations on the testing policy to the ministry. Membership of the OMT is a confidential matter.’ According to the RIVM, Diagned is not a member of the OMT. The RIVM also stated that the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport – and not the OMT – makes the policy decision to take more action to ramp up the supply of testing materials by Roche or other manufacturers.
‘Every man for itself’-mindset
A spokesperson of the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport revealed that the ministry and Roche will convene Friday afternoon to discuss the supply of testing materials. We have yet to receive a response to our question which steps Minister Hugo de Jonge is willing to take to ease the testing shortages.
It is evident that the RIVM – in stark contrast to the recommendations of the WHO – has so far favoured economical use of the Dutch testing capability. The laboratory of University Medical Center Groningen has disregarded this policy, which caused a controversy earlier this week. This lab turns out not to be dependent on a single supplier by spreading its risks over various manufacturers. This is in contrast with the situation of most other labs in the Netherlands, which have to purchase their equipment from Roche. The Groningen lab angered Health Minister Hugo de Jonge, who accused the lab of adopting an ‘every man for himself’ mindset. ‘This is not how you handle a crisis.’
Roche’s position caused an outrage in the House of Representatives yesterday. There was overwhelming support for a motion for the minister to force Roche to publish the recipe for testing solution via a ‘compulsory licence’. But lysis buffer is not subject to a patent, so that it remains to be seen whether this drastic remedy is useful. The road of enforcement via antitrust law seems to be more obvious, especially now that the EC is homing in on that strategy.
Last week, the European competition authorities issued a joint statement in which they said to keep a sharp eye on companies that abuse their position of power. ‘It is of utmost importance to ensure that products considered essential to protect the health of consumers in the current situation remain available at competitive prices. The European competition authorities will therefore not hesitate to take action against companies taking advantage of the current situation.’
Roche’s smoke screen
The secret recipe of Roche’s lysis buffer is alleged to be freely available online, according to the Netherlands Broadcasting Corporation (Nederlandse Omroep Stichting – NOS) yesterday. Roche CEO Esther de Rooij repeated this statement on TV talk show Jinek last night: “The recipe is known and is freely available on the internet. As far as I’m concerned, this is not a subject of discussion.” This proved to be a false statement. When Roche eventually provided a link to the recipe, it turned out to be an old recipe from 1990 for lysis buffer in general. De Rooij eventually admitted that this was indeed the case.
To be clear: the recipe on the internet is not the recipe for the lysis buffer which Roche itself produces.The old recipe is of no use to labs.As explained by Follow the Money last Thursday, it is very cumbersome for laboratories to switch to another type of lysis buffer. De Telegraaf did not fall for the frame by Roche. The newspaper’s political commentator, Wouter de Winther, was also on the TV talk show and labelled the statement of De Rooij as ‘untruthful’.
Incidentally, De Rooij did not give an inch on the TV talk show: Roche is not going to publish the recipe. The Dutch Labour party leader Lodewijk Asscher urged the company to extend its full cooperation in easing the shortages and to not stand in the way of solutions out of commercial interests. Pharmaceutical company Roche announced Friday afternoon that it will release the recipe for its lysis buffer should Dutch laboratories ask for it.
“I want to thank Roche, a great company, for their incredible work”. This will allow an additional 1.4 million tests to be carried out in the near future, with an additional 5 million tests even possible within a month, Trump explained.
In order to carry out the coronavirus tests developed by Roche, hospitals and laboratories require either of the cobas 6800 or cobas 8800 automated systems. These are widespread in the USA and around the world, according to Roche. The comprehensive testing capacities that are now available will allow rapid, effective reactions to combat this pandemic, explains Thomas Schinecker, CEO of Roche Diagnostics, in the press release. With cobas 6800/8800, a total of 96 tests can be analyzed within the space of three hours. Extra test stations increase this number further still. With cobas SARS-CoV-2, the results of the coronavirus tests are available within three-and-a-half hours, Roche states.
Trump’s Coronavirus Calendar
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRejectRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.