ECP NetHappenings Get Off Zero

©2025 Sign Up NetHappenings News Email List https://cyberplayground.org
©2025 Follow@CyberPlayGround
©1998-©2025 *Educational CyberPlayGround®
©2025 https://k12playground.com
©2025 https://RichAsHell.com
©1993 – ©2025 https://edu-cyberpg.com

Dear NetHappenings Reader,

The message is — Save Yourself

Just  Get Off Zero — Get to .01 BTC

How many people do you know have been using the internet for 34 years?

Remember I’ve been on the internet since 1991 and have seen it all … everything….

I’ve been Publishing in print since 1990 & publishing online since 1996. There aren’t a lot of websites from 1996 BUT MY ECP SITE STILL IS!
http://edu-cyberpg.com

The first site CERN on December 20th, 1990
Invented by Tim Berners Lee, the first website went live at research lab CERN in 1990
The WorldWideWeb (W3) is a wide-area hypermedia[1] information retrieval initiative aiming to give universal access to a large universe of documents.
https://line-mode.cern.ch/www/hypertext/WWW/TheProject.html
more
https://web.archive.org/web/20160317062257/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/internet/12061803/The-worlds-first-website-went-online-25-years-ago-today.html

I know the internet was only made available for .edu users before 1991 and civilians were only first permitted online in 1991 that’s when I started.

The internet didn’t start out with security or money. Back then the academics were all nice people who knew each other, and didn’t bother thinking about security or business or money.

It’s easy looking back now that security was going to be a problem when civilians got on the net and how businesses would also be a problem when they were allowed on in 1995.

When all the other experiments with the internet and money failed it was Bitcoin that solved all the problems.

Security is still a problem but BTC bitcoin is, and will never get hacked. Michael Saylor can explain why, which  basically amounts to it would cost to much.

First Principals

Every other shit coin is another stab at using a technology they say is to solve a problem that really isn’t. Bitcoin over the lightning network is all anybody needs and it’s there right now.

Bitcoin can be programmed to do anything any of the other shitcoins do if developers wanted to do it. But all the bitcoin node operators would be the actual ones to implement the code and use it and only if they believed the new code/program was correct. Node runners all over the world decide to use it or not, and any person running a node decides also. Nobody rules bitcoin. Nobody is the CEO. There is no marketing department. Nobody is in charge. Bitcoin is sovereign. You are the bank.

Bitcoin is the one and only pristine money. Bitcoin is 100 million satoshis. You’ll get paid in satochis. Internet agents will will pay each other in satoshis.

100,000 million satochis = 1 bitcoin is  here for 15 years all the congress members own it there are laws about it now.

How much bitcoin do you need?
Just get 0.01 to start then add more and more as you go along.

and as always …

THIS IS NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE.

THIS IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.

p.s.
FOR THOSE who still don’t know how to start ….
go open an account at Fidelity (not sponsored) and purchase some BTC easy peasy puddin pie.

5 thoughts on “ECP NetHappenings Get Off Zero”

  1. Mexican Billionaire’s 70% Portfolio Allocated to Bitcoin
    https://lolacoin.org/mexican-billionaires-70-portfolio-allocated-to-bitcoin/

    The Richest People in Bitcoin 5/4/25
    #Bitcoin #Whales #BTC #Crypto
    Est. BTC price: $65,000 back then
    Bitcoin Wealth Estimates by Xavior

    1️⃣ Satoshi Nakamoto: ~1,100,000 BTC ($71.5B)
    2️⃣ MicroStrategy (Saylor): ~190,000 BTC ($12.3B)
    3️⃣ Winklevoss Twins: ~150,000 BTC ($9.8B)
    4️⃣ Tim Draper: ~120,000 BTC ($7.8B)
    5️⃣ Barry Silbert: ~78,000 BTC ($5.1B)
    6️⃣ CZ (Binance): ~70,000 BTC ($4.5B)
    7️⃣ Brian Armstrong: ~60,000 BTC ($3.9B)
    8️⃣ Tesla/X (Musk): ~43,000 BTC ($2.8B)
    9️⃣ Matthew Roszak: ~35,000 BTC ($2.3B)
    � a16z: ~31,000 BTC ($2.0B)
    11. Anthony Di Iorio: ~28,000 BTC ($1.8B)
    12. Blythe Masters: ~25,000 BTC ($1.6B)
    13. Roger Ver: ~20,000 BTC ($1.3B)
    14. Charlie Shrem: ~18,000 BTC ($1.2B)
    15. Mike Novogratz: ~16,500 BTC ($1.1B)
    16. Chamath: ~15,000 BTC ($975M)
    17. Jack Dorsey: ~14,000 BTC ($910M)
    18. Gavin Andresen: ~12,000 BTC ($780M)
    19. Trace Mayer: ~11,000 BTC ($715M)
    20. Jihan Wu: ~10,000 BTC ($650M)

  3. https://x.com/JoshMandell6/status/1917847480806564209
    @JoshMandell6
    I’ve been thinking about this a lot recently. This is going to sound weird but sometimes my mind sees a series of paths projected out into the future, like a binomial tree …. and I can sometimes make out a most likely path in an Occam’s razor sort of way. I saw a path to a number that I think was 18 or 1818, I think the latter. So it was either 18 mNAV or a price of $1818 on a spike. Once I saw Saylor’s aggressive selling and target of 1.5 – 2 (which is lower than he had been selling), I figured I might have it wrong. Certainly 18 mNAV seems crazy … that would put MSTR above $14K per sharej … LOL

    $1818 would only be 2.26 mNAV at $444K Bitcoin …

    So here’s two self-critical thoughts:

    1. MSTR = 1818, or 2.26 mNAV would have seemed VERY low to me before hearing
    @Saylor’s recent commentary and behavior.

    2. MSTR 18m NAV would require some kinda perfect storm such as:

    a. Saylor announces another large ATM plan, but puts in on the back burner, which leads mNAV to began to expand … shorts build up until Saylor starts to tap the ATM at a higher NAV, emboldening more shorts … but his sales are getting gobbled up by a large buyer going long, leaving the shorts unfilled … this process repeats, causing serious pain with the short-sellers. Now we clear 10 mNAV and he messes with the market, pausing further ATMs in lieu of some very large convertible bond sales, just huge private placements. By the time we hit mNAV 14, the shorts are starting to see buy-ins because they are failing to deliver. Then news leaks that there is a very good reason that MSTR should trade at such a large premium, namely a Nation where it is illegal to own/trade bitcoin so MSTR is the only way to get a lot of liquidity and exposure to their new favorite asset. A large sell wall (of China) is broken at 15 mNAV and we jump to 18 NAV because of some kind of affinity to that number or one of its components. Saylor opens up the ATM floodgates right there.

    It isn’t clear and well illuminated in my mind anymore, and was never like the 84K on Pi Day level of certainty, but it was the occams razer path until very recently (Saylors 1.5 – 2.0 statement messed things up, it felt)

    It’s probably nothing … maybe just gummies.

    Close Encounters of the 444th time
    I can’t put a number on it … I was certain about 84K on Pi day but I feel like Saylor sold MSTR below 2.0 and then announced that’s the best they could hope for so that messed me up because hi IS the supply

    –//–

    with 21 capital in the mix, iron sharpens iron and now that there is a direct comparison, Saylor will have to do better and be more nuanced to attracted investment. If Mallers lets mnav run, Saylor will have to as well. I think Mallers will be very focused early on returns for shareholders. He wants the comparisons.

  5. Buffett controls 4.6% of the U.S. Treasury Bill Market.
    Saylor guards 3.37% of bitcoin’s available supply.
    Who’s holding the stronger hand?

Comments are closed.