In recent years, the right to religious liberty has increasingly been exploited and misused in order to favor the interests of select, privileged conservative Protestant Christians over the basic rights of the most vulnerable Americans.
I’d like this law based on my religion since that’s how SCOTUS thinks they can do it here in America.
My religion says no one may ever, ever fuck a registered Republican. It will be Punishable by $100k fine or 10 years in prison.
My religion says I can chop off the penises of Republican men and face no legal consequences. Let’s make a law based on my religion.
When a suit against abortion is filed on religious grounds because it denies abortions that are allowed under Jewish tenets, SCOTUS will not accept it as it has Christian tenets.
They have destroyed the Establishment Clause and its wall. I proved in 73 Yale LJ 593 (1964) that the two clauses were mutually dependent. Jonathan Weiss
https://cyberplayground.org/2020/01/21/jonathan-a-weiss-esq-bibliography/
OUTLINE
ABOLISH THE SUPREME COURT – WHY NOT?
FOUNDING – PLATO’S PHILOSOPHER KING
BEARD ON RICH WHITE MEN
JUDGES OLD BOYS CLUB (IDENTITY NOT DIVERSITY) FROM LAW FIRMS, PROSECUTORS, SPRINKLING OF ESTABLISHMENT LAW SCHOOL
SELECTION DISTORTED BY BAD STATES WITH UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS.
IMPLICIT – TREASON, HIGH CRIME., PRIVILEGE, IMMUNITIES, EQUAL PROTECTION—COMMON LAW FROM ENGLAND INTO CASES WITH BRITISH IDEAS
JUDGING – LAWYERS ALMOST ALWAYS PICK JURIES – NOTE ROBERTS “FINDING OF FACT” NO MORE RACISM!
HISTORY – SUPREME COURT AND RACISM BOOK
ROAD NOT TAKEN
ASIANS (NOT YICK WO NOT FOLLOWED) EXCLUSION CON CAMPS
INDIANS GENOCIDE LAND GRAB NO RIGHTS
TRUMP COURT MILLHISER THE AGENDA
OBJECTIONS – CIRCUIT COURT UNIFORMITY – CF, STATES; VERY FEW – -PANEL OF CHIEF JUDGES (13) OR SELECTED RANDOMLY IF NECESSARY
– DISPUTE BETWEEN STATES – PANEL W/O STATES INVOLVED
– ORIGINAL JURISDICTION RARE – SEPARATE COURT RETIRED
– TRI PART (MARSHALL SUPERIORITY – EXCUSE FOR BAD LAWS
PRESIDENTIAL – PRIVILEGE; ROOSEVELT GREAT S, GREEN
– BAD STATES NEED REFORMS – SEE SELECTIONS – INCREASE – SCRUTINY OF STATE. DISTRICT AND APPEAL FEDERAL COURTS
– MARBURY V. MADISON; CITY OF BOURNE – CORRECT?
– EFFECTUATION -AMEND PART III; LIMIT JURISDICTION TO – ORIGINAL (SOME DISPUTES BETWEEN CIRCUITS?)
– NOTE 160 CASES A YEAR
RECENT INVENTIONS – MONEY IS SPEECH CORRUPTING DEMOCRACY
-FACT FINDING – NO MORE RACISM GUTTING VOTING RIGHTS
– QUALIFIED IMMUNITY- INVENTED FOR JIM CROW v 13-15 th AMENDMENTS SPECIFYING STATE OFFICIALS
– BUSH V. GORE – IF PRESIDENT HADN’T EXPECTED SUPREMES TO RESOLVE, MAYBE HE WOULD HAVE SENT TROOPS (LIKE IKE IN ARKANSAS) IN: KING& WEISS, BUSH.V GORE:WHERE WERE THE TROOPS?, Pace Law Review
PARADE – CONTRACT LAW – NO ADHESION, FINE PRINT- ARBITRATION
– TAFT HARTLEY LAW FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION – LABOR
– WORKMAN COMES PREEMPTS TORT (CASE?) APPROVED
– WELFARE LAW
– ANTI TRUST
– ADVANCING RETRIBUTIVE CRIMINAL LAW: POOR; MINORITIES
– PRISONS (REHNQUIST) CRUEL- UNUSUAL (INTERNATIONAL)
– CAPITAL PUNISHMENT- “” (WESTERN EUROPE_
– REPRESENTATION RIGHT – MOCKED DISPARITY 13-15 AM
– ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION (WEISS ARTICLE) KSTARR+ CHRISTIANITY (AND TRADITIONAL…)
– CENTRAL ? 2ND AM CRUCIAL DEFINITION OF “ARMS” IGNORED
– FREE SPEECH-
– GUANTANAMO – REFUGEES; IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS
ROBERTS C’OUP DE GRACE – ELECTIONS, MONEY, GERRYMANDING, VOTING RIGHTS; RACE PROTECTIONS; SHADOW DOCKET, FACT FINDING AGAIN
POLITICAL FEASABILITY – BETTER THAN SEE SAW OF NUMBERS
LEFT AND RIGHT DISCONTENTS
EMPOWERMENT OF GRASS ROOTS WITHOUT COURT RELIANCE
COMPARE CANADA?
.