#covidzombies idiots in Harrisburg, PA with no masks, no distancing, & young children around.
The Leader of group
peddling bleach
as a coronavirus ‘cure’ wrote to
OH YES #COVIDIOTS
#InjectDisinfectant
#DontDrinkBleach
#disinfectant
#Clorox, #Lysol #Dettol
Lysol and Dettol manufacturer tells customers not to inject disinfectants as possible treatment for COVID-19
* FDA SAYS HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & CHLOROQUINE HAVE NOT BEEN SHOWN TO BE SAFE & EFFECTIVE FOR TREATING OR PREVENTING COVID-19
https://www.reuters.com/article/brief-fda-cautions-against-use-of-hydrox-idUSFWN2CC20M
DO YOU HAVE TO RESPECT EVERYONE’S OPINION?
HELL NO!!!!!!!!
CAUSE THEY PUT YOUR LIFE AT RISK !!!!!!!!!!!
ANTI CLIMATE CHANGE PEOPLE
ANTI VACCINE PEOPLE
ANTI LOCKDOWN PEOPLE refusing to be ‘enslaved’
ALL ANTI SCIENCE PEOPLE ARE:
– ANTI FACTUAL NO PROVABLE FACTS NEEDED
– IGNORANT BRAINWASHED PEOPLE
– MISTAKE THEIR “FEELINGS” , “BELIEFS” AND “FAITH” AS JUST AS VALUABLE AS ACTUAL PROVABLE SCIENTIFIC FACTS.
The Right Wing Wants You to Die
GOP PRO DEATH
GOP PARTY OF DEATH
GOP PARTY OF POWER
GOP PARTY OF CONTROL OVER YOUR WOMEN’S BODY
GOP PARTY OF MONEY – YOU CAN DIE
NO SCIENCE HERE
NO UNIVERSITY TRAINED HERE
NO HIGER EDUCATION HERE
NO SMART PEOPLE HERE
NO EDUCATED PEOPLE HERE
NO CRITICAL THINKERS HERE
NO READERS HERE
- GOP DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE FACTS
- GOP SEES NO VALUE IN SCIENCE OR SCIENTISTS
- GOP DOCTORS ARE NOT SMART OR TO BE BELIEVED EITHER
ALL BECAUSE RIGHTEOUS ‘FEELS’
#COVIDZOMBIES #COVIDIOTS
- THEIR “FEELS” AND “BELIEFS” DO NOT HAVE THE SAME VALUE AS FACTUAL SCIENTIFIC PROVABLE DATA
- “WHAT SOME PEOPLE SAY…..”IS JUST AS TRUE AS SCIENCE – IS NOT EQUAL A CORRECT FACTUAL PROOF
- OPINIONS DO NOT HAVE THE SAME VALUE THEY ARE NOT EQUAL
- “FAITH” AND OPINIONS ARE NOT SUPERIOR OR JUST AS GOOD AS SCIENCE
- “RIGHTEOUS” BELIEFS ARE NOT FACTS THEY ARE SUPERSTITIONS
- FACTS LIKE GRAVITY ARE STILL CORRECT WHEN YOU ARE DEAD
- SCIENCE MATTERS BECAUSE UNEDUCATED OPINIONS ARE NOT EQUAL TO THE VALUE OF SCIENCE
- SCIENTIFIC FACTS THAT CAN BE PROVEN IS SUPERIOR BECAUSE IT WILL KEEP YOU ALIVE
- FACTS ARE NOT OPINIONS
- SCIENTIFIC FACTS CAN BE PROVEN TRUE EVEN “””WHEN””” YOU DO NOT “FEEL IT IS TRUE”
- PEOPLE WHO DON’T BELIEVE SCIENCE WILL BE DEAD.
OPINIONS ABOUT FAITH ARE LIKE ASSHOLES EVERYONE HAS ONE.
WHO NEEDS SCIENCE WHEN YOU HAVE FOX NEWS BRAIN WASHING AND LYING TO YOU INSTEAD
Fox News Admits Error. It’s Now Become a Constitutional Issue.
A federal judge has ruled that the network’s decision to retract its Seth Rich story isn’t privileged. Now, the cable outlet tells a federal judge that he’s making a consequential mistake by refusing to stop a reporter’s deposition.
A few years before Roger Ailes was ousted from Fox News, he boasted how the influential cable news network had never taken down a story because it was wrong. That wasn’t exactly true, but nevertheless, one doesn’t need to consume hydroxychloroquine to know that admitting error happens very rarely in Fox Nation. Of course, few journalists like to own up to mistakes. When they do, do they lose First Amendment protections?
The legal consequences for fessing up to error (if not going so far as to be apologetic) is coming up in court after Fox News retracted some of its reporting about the 2016 murder of Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich.
In a written opinion two weeks ago that has until now escaped any attention, a DC federal judge ruled that Fox News journalist Malia Zimmerman had to testify in deposition on several topics including the network’s decision to retract. On Wednesday, Fox News pushed that judge to change his mind — or at least retreat somewhat — with the warning that staying the course would “carry potentially significant consequences for Ms. Zimmerman, Fox News and other journalists beyond this specific subpoena.”
Rich was fatally shot in July 2016 in what police described as a mugging gone wrong. In conservative circles, however, some asserted that Rich had been murdered to cover for how he — and not Russian hackers — had infiltrated and leaked DNC emails to WikiLeaks. The conspiracy theory proved alluring to those wishing to discredit allegations that the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russians.
The legal fallout from Fox News’ Seth Rich reporting has been immense, and some of the decisions emanating from the subsequent lawsuits will reverberate for years to come. In particular, despite the presumption in media circles that the dead can’t be defamed, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals last September revived a suit against Fox News brought by Rich’s parents. The appellate judges accepted the proposition that media companies can be held liable for inflicting emotional distress. A few weeks earlier, a Texas judge allowed a lawsuit against National Public Radio over its reporting about Ed Butowsky, a Texas businessman with connections to the White House who allegedly pushed Fox News to publish its initial story about the Rich murder. (Butowsky was an unpaid guest on the network.) NPR unsuccessfully argued that its reporting was just a fair and accurate account of a separate defamation lawsuit from Rod Wheeler, the investigator hired by Rich’s family who accused Fox News of fabricating quotes to help Trump.
If all that’s not confusing enough, the latest decision forcing Zimmerman to submit to a deposition comes in yet another case. In this one, Rich’s brother Aaron targets Butowsky, America First Media and The Washington Times for what was said about him.
After Fox News retreated from its Seth Rich reporting (the cable news outlet issued a statement in May 2017 how its article “was not initially subjected to the high degree of editorial scrutiny we require for all our reporting”), Aaron Rich alleges he became a focal point of conspiracy theories. Having worked for a U.S. defense contractor, Seth Rich’s brother says the narrative shifted to his purported role in the leak of DNC emails.
Now, in the midst of this case, Aaron Rich seeks testimony from Zimmerman about her understanding of what Butowsky communicated to third parties plus any information that could determine whether Butowsky acted intentionally or recklessly. In other words, the plaintiff seeks to establish actual malice by doing some digging at Fox News.
In late March, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon rejected a bid to stop Zimmerman’s deposition. Following up in a written order (read here), the judge explained that she and Fox News hadn’t justified protecting her from testimony via the newsgathering privilege under the First Amendment and New York’s shield law. Leon doubted the privilege applied to the decision to retract Fox News article and her communications with Butowsky since he was “neither a journalist nor a news source.”
“No matter the scope of the newsgathering privilege, it does not extend to those topics, which do not involve ‘newsgathering,'” wrote Leon, nodding to a famous case from the 1980s.
That case would be Westmoreland v. CBS, a huge libel action over the network’s investigatory documentary about the Vietnam War. The details of that lawsuit aren’t particularly important here. What may be relevant, though, is something that came up during the discovery process.
“The question in Westmoreland was whether the newsgathering privilege shielded a retrospective, internal report that that president of CBS had commissioned to evaluate a complaint about the organization’s reporting, where CBS’s president had quoted and relied on the report in a press release that was itself the subject of a libel claim,” writes Fox News’ attorneys in a motion for reconsideration filed Wednesday.
They add, “Westmoreland has little to say about the present dispute — in which a third party seeks a reporter’s testimony about a news organization’s internal deliberations about whether to retract a report.”
Fox News argues in its motion (read here) that the process leading to the issuance of a retraction is no less an exercise in editorial judgment as the initial decision to publish. The network says that deciding whether to continue to publish deserves as much respect, and that a news organization in making such a conclusion will factor the credibility of sources, whether an article comports with editorial standards, whether revisions are warranted, and how a family’s request not to publish should be weighed against the public’s interest in disclosure.
Additionally, Fox News argues that the judge takes too narrow a view on who qualifies as a “source” — that Butowsky should count as one even if he wasn’t quoted in Zimmerman’s story.
If Judge Leon won’t bend and admit his own error, Fox News would like him to at least “rest its ruling on the narrowest ground available — that Mr. Rich has overcome the newsgathering privilege as to certain topics that arguably go to the heart of his claims.”
The network that very infrequently concedes mistakes (and may be further discouraged from doing so if the ruling stands) says that going this route and staying away from reaching a constitutional issue would make sense, adding, “[I]t would leave for another day important questions, with consequences for all journalists, about the protections that they may assert against intrusions into the newsgathering and editorial processes.”
WHO NEEDS SCIENCE WHEN YOU HAVE FOX NEWS AND FACEBOOK BRAINWASHING YOU INSTEAD
AND #Facebook’s role in the spread of information about protests against government orders to stay at home.
“Unless government prohibits the event during this time, we allow it to be organized on #$Facebook,” the spokesperson said. “For this same reason, events that defy government’s guidance on social distancing aren’t allowed on Facebook.”
Sen. Elizabeth Warren unveils a plan to break up big technology companies like Amazon, Facebook and Google.
Her proposal is the most specific one put forth in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary to limit Silicon Valley.
@amazon @jeffbezos #amazon richest scumbag on planet earth.
If you sell items on Amazon, Amazon will use their data to compete with you.
Amazon is literally killing invention and ingenuity, the soul of American small business.
“Be successful, but not so successful Amazon finds out or they will undercut you.”
I’m pretty sure 18th and 19th century libertarian free market economists didn’t anticipate corporations being able to marshal enough resources to compete with anyone at anything, anywhere in the world simultaneously.
Amazon says it doesn’t use information on third-party sellers to inform its private-label business. But interviews with more than 20 employees and documents I reviewed show a pattern of using this data to create their own competing items. This report raises deep concerns about Amazon’s apparent lack of candor before the Committee regarding an issue that is central to our investigation,” Jerrold Nadler (D., N.Y.) said in the memo on Thursday following our story. We need an ethical competitor to Amazon… one that is a PLATFORM but NOT a competitor to businesses. It’s wrong to be both a platform AND competitor. And co-op at least 49% AND TAX THEM PROPER!!!
https://twitter.com/DanaMattioli/status/1253324855006486529
Elizabeth Warren the ‘clear choice’ for Biden’s vice president
VICE PRESIDENT Sen. Elizabeth Warren WILL push to break up big tech companies like Amazon and Facebook
Warren’s proposal would also prevent Amazon from selling its own branded products through its platform, resulting in lost revenue for the company but not killing the business model of taking a cut of every other transaction on the website. The move would alleviate one of the biggest concerns of other sellers on the marketplace — that Amazon can determine which products are featured and promoted more prominently.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/08/politics/elizabeth-warren-amazon-google-facebook/index.html
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/elizabeth-warren-the-clear-choice-for-bidens-vp-poll