[ECP] NetHappenings Mailing List

Today’s Read

Noble  fundamental ideals that serve the public interest do not exist in the university.

The best-endowed universities IS THE #1 WAY for perpetuating hereditary patterns of affluence and privilege. They have no intention of fulfilling it’s so called purpose of giving poor people a chance to upset their power and money.

Educational CyberPlayGround:
COMPARE HIGHER EDUCATION UNIVERSITY INC. CAMPUS COMMERCIALIZATION AND THE CEO SALARY FROM 1994 – 2018
The Commodification of the University As Product leaves them without Moral Authority.
https://www.edu-cyberpg.com/Teachers/muniversityCEO.html
The earnings of many top university presidents are spiraling up toward $1 million a year, according to an annual survey by The Chronicle of Higher Education, rising far more quickly than faculty salaries.
Forty-two presidents of private universities were paid $500,000 or more in the 2003 fiscal year, the most recent for which figures are available, compared with 27 presidents the previous year. Just two earned half a million in 1994.
Executive Compensation at Private and Public Colleges
By Dan Bauman, Tyler Davis, and Brian O’Leary JULY 15, 2018
https://www.chronicle.com/interactives/executive-compensation?cid=trend_right_a#id=table_public_2017
The Chronicle‘s executive-compensation package includes the latest data on more than 1,400 chief executives at more than 600 private colleges from 2008-15 and nearly 250 public universities and systems from 2010-17. Hover over bars to show total compensation as well as pay components including base, bonus, and other. Click bars to see details including other top-paid college employees, how presidents compare with their peers, and how presidential pay looks in context to an institution’s expenses, tuition, and pay for professors. Updated July 15, 2018, with 2016-17 public-college data.
How Republican and Democratic Wish Lists on Higher Education Stack Up
https://www.chronicle.com/article/How-RepublicanDemocratic/244007
Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives on Tuesday introduced their proposal to reauthorize the Higher Education Act, the main legislation governing federal higher-education policy. Their bill, called the Aim Higher Act, presents a stark contrast to the Republican alternative, the Promoting Real Opportunity, Success, and Prosperity Through Education Reform Act, or the Prosper Act, which was unveiled last year and currently awaits action on the House floor. Legislators in both parties agree that the higher-education system is flawed. Access to affordable four-year degrees is limited, and students struggle with loan debt. The two bills suggest changes in several of the same programs, including simplifying the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, holding colleges accountable to their goals and their students’ educational outcomes, and enhancing access for more financially vulnerable students. But how the bills would go about making those changes differs greatly.
The University Run Amok! Higher education’s insatiable appetite for doing more will be its undoing
https://www.chronicle.com/article/Why-The-Universitys/244010
Dozens of Colleges’ Upward Bound Applications Are Denied for Failing to Dot Every I ‘It’s more about format than it is about content’
https://www.chronicle.com/article/Dozens-of-Colleges-Upward/239895
For the want of double spacing in a small section of a 65-page grant application, 109 low-income high-school students will be cut off from a program at Wittenberg University that has been providing them with tutoring and counseling to prepare them for college. And they’re not alone. Over the past few weeks at least 40 colleges and organizations with similar Upward Bound programs have also had their grant applications summarily rejected by the U.S. Department of Education for running afoul of rules on mandatory double-spacing rules, use of the wrong font, or other minor technical glitches. The affected colleges, whose programs serve at least 2,400 low-income students, and the members of Congress who represent them are furious, especially because their appeals to the department for reconsideration have so far been met with little sympathy or indication of any sort of resolution. “She told me, ‘A rule is a rule.’ She told me, ‘Eddie, I too have to abide by the rules.’” The program director for Upward Bound at Wittenberg, Eddie L. Chambers, said he did have a conversation with Linda Byrd-Johnson, acting deputy assistant secretary for higher-education programs. It was “gracious,” said Mr. Chambers, who has overseen the Wittenberg program for 40 of its 50 years. “But in the end, she told me, ‘A rule is a rule.’ She told me, ‘Eddie, I too have to abide by the rules.’”

One thought on “[ECP] NetHappenings Mailing List”

  1. Fantastic web site. A lot of helpful information here. I am sending it to a few friends and also sharing. And certainly, thank you on your sweat!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *