ECP NetHappenings Jeffrey Epstein’s Ranch Won $85 Million in the Oklahoma Lottery

❤️️ Sign Up ©2026 NetHappenings News Email List
https://cyberplayground.org
©2026 Follow@CyberPlayGround
©1998-©2026 *Educational CyberPlayGround®
©2026 https://k12playground.com
©2026 https://RichAsHell.com
©1993 – ©2026 https://edu-cyberpg.com

ESSAY

Jeffrey Epstein’s Ranch Won $85 Million in the Oklahoma Lottery Two Days After He Went to Prison. The Company That Printed the Ticket Belonged to His Palm Beach Neighbor.

The Store That Sold It Belonged to The Neighbor’s Former Colleague. And The Ranch, Which Was Never Searched, Now Belongs to a Trump Insider’s Family. Follow the Money, Part Two.

🎩 By Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez

Yesterday, I published the first installment of a four-part series I’ve written in which I follow the money related to Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, from its purchase from the King family in 1993 to its new owners, Don and Mary Catherine Huffines. What follows here is part two. By following the money, a terrifying picture begins to emerge, an existential threat to the national security of the United States of America.

In yesterday’s part one of this series, I shared a bit about the financial relationships between dead child rapist and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and former New Mexico Governor Bruce King and his son, former New Mexico Attorney General Gary King. To briefly summarize, Epstein’s Zorro Trust purchased nearly 7,500 acres outside Stanley, New Mexico, from the King family for $12.3 million in 1993, after the King family sold it off to help pay $21 million in debts on their various businesses. I recounted the evidence of child sex rape and trafficking that took place at Zorro Ranch for decades, and ended the piece with the vastly under-reported fact that Zorro Trust won the Oklahoma Powerball lottery in 2008, two days after Epstein began serving his first — and far too lenient — jail term, in the amount of $85 million.

Today we pick up there. With that lottery win. While I’ve seen a few stories online about it, no serious news outlet has covered it. I suspect this is because plausible deniability is built into the way Oklahoma law allows trusts to win the lottery while legally protecting the identity of the trust’s owners. This law exists in theory to protect large jackpot winners from being hounded or robbed. But it also creates fertile ground for fraud. Not even a freedom of information act records request from a reporter can unseal those records. The only way we could ever find out for certain, from lottery officials, that the Zorro Trust that won on July 2, 2008, was the same Zorro Trust that bought the ranch in Stanley, New Mexico — a six-hour drive from the convenience store where the ticket was purchased — would be if the courts demanded the record unsealed. So far, that hasn’t happened.

There are, however, other ways to put together a strong circumstantial case.

One way is to go to Stanley and other points in this state and ask around. Which I did. I live here. We’re a big state with a small population. Everyone knows everyone, and my family has been here for 13 generations. Lots of regular people worked on that ranch — as staff, as contractors. And while it’s clear in the Epstein files that Epstein and his wealthy associates didn’t think much of the working poor who cleaned their toilets and took out their trash, such disregard by the rich for those they exploit tends not to breed loyalty in the end, because the working poor are human. That said, people are still reluctant to give their names publicly, because many were forced to sign non-disclosure agreements, and others witnessed abuses so horrific they’re pretty sure that even with Epstein dead, there are still people who want this all to go away.

I want to pause here to say this: Former employees of Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch who signed non-disclosure agreements may have more legal freedom to speak than they realize. The Speak Out Act, signed into federal law in 2022, significantly curtailed the enforceability of NDAs involving sexual assault and sexual harassment, gutting one of the primary legal mechanisms used to silence witnesses to abuse. Beyond that, courts have long held that no contract can compel someone to conceal criminal conduct — an NDA that functions as a cover-up is, by definition, unenforceable as against public policy. Whistleblower protections further shield anyone who comes forward to law enforcement or journalists investigating matters of legitimate public concern. And there is a practical reality worth noting: Epstein is dead, his ranch has changed hands, and any attempt by his estate to sue a former employee for speaking truthfully about crimes would open that estate to the very discovery process it would most want to avoid. The NDA, in other words, may have always been more threat than law.

Which is all to say: people here in New Mexico know that it was Epstein’s Zorro Trust that won the Oklahoma lottery two days after he began to serve his first prison sentence. They also know who bought the ticket. Brice Gordon, a former New Zealand soldier who managed the estate with his wife Karen, also a former New Zealand soldier. I’d ask them about it directly, but they seem to have disappeared off the face of the earth after inheriting $2 million when Epstein died.

Now that we have all that out of the way, let’s look at the people and entities involved behind the scenes in making that win possible — a win with 146 million to one odds for regular people, and likely far greater odds for a convicted pedophile in prison. It’s in those details that the picture begins to come into focus.

Fact No. 1: The Man at the Top

James Scroggins materialized in the world of American state lotteries the way certain figures do in industries built on government contracts and quiet relationships — fully formed and without much of a paper trail explaining how he got there. He ran the Pennsylvania lottery, then the Missouri lottery for thirteen years, then arrived in Oklahoma in 2005 to launch its lottery from scratch. He was the executive director of the Oklahoma Lottery Commission on July 2, 2008, when the Zorro Trust walked in and claimed $85 million — which the trust opted to take as a $29.3 million lump sum. He was the man legally required to receive the trust’s membership disclosure — the document naming the actual human beings behind that claim. He is one of a very small number of people alive who knows what that document said.

Scroggins is not a man the public knows much about. Search his name and you find almost nothing — no consulting website, no professional biography, no industry award profiles, no conference keynotes, no press releases announcing his next chapter after he left public service. His LinkedIn profile exists, but is set to private, a curious posture for a man who spent two decades as a government official administering a public trust. What we know about him comes almost entirely from contemporaneous news coverage of the lotteries he ran. And what that coverage reveals, once you read across all four states and all four decades, is a consistent pattern: wherever James Scroggins went, the rules bent.

It started in Pennsylvania.

In the late 1980s, while Scroggins was serving as Pennsylvania’s lottery director, a man named Nick Herbst walked into lottery offices to claim a nine-month-old $15.2 million Super 7 jackpot. The ticket was reviewed at the lottery offices and approved for payment by Scroggins personally — over the written objections of at least one lottery staff member who had flagged a serious problem with the ticket’s validity. The problem was this: while the lottery’s computer showed the ticket had been sold at the Neshaminy Mall in Bensalem, Bucks County, the paper the ticket was printed on carried a serial number assigned to a lot of paper sent to a Scranton lottery agent — a completely different location. The two records did not match. Scroggins ordered the claim honored anyway. Herbst was ushered to a press conference, given a check for the first installment, posed for photographers, and answered reporters’ questions. He claimed he had forgotten about the ticket and had been using it as a bookmark.

The ticket was a fraud. It had been fabricated by an employee of the company that provided computer systems to the lottery — a scheme that required inside access to the technical infrastructure of the game itself. Two men, Herbst and a computer repairman alleged to have masterminded the scheme, were arrested and charged with forgery, theft, conspiracy, tampering with public information, and unlawful use of a computer. When the arrests were made, Scroggins stood before reporters and said: “This situation proves beyond a shadow of a doubt the system works. Yes, there was a payment made to someone who in fact was not a winner, but those persons were apprehended.” That claim was disputed by at least one official privy to the details of the investigation.

It was not the last time Scroggins would find himself defending a suspicious claim he had personally approved.

He moved on to Missouri, where he ran the lottery for thirteen years without surfacing in major public scandals — though it bears noting that Missouri was a Scientific Games contract state throughout his tenure, cementing a long working relationship between Scroggins and the executives of the company that would later hold Oklahoma’s lottery contract.

Then came Oklahoma, where the pattern sharpened considerably.

Two years before the Zorro Trust claimed its $85 million, a different anonymous trust claimed a $101.8 million Powerball jackpot in Oklahoma. Scroggins told a reporter at the time that the commission did not even know who the winners were — that their identities were not stated in the trust agreement. Under the Oklahoma Lottery Act, the commission was required to withhold delinquent child support payments from lottery winnings. But Scroggins, backed by the state Attorney General’s office, declared that requirement inapplicable in this case. The winners’ identities were protected. No background search was conducted. No child support check was run. The precedent had been set: anonymous trust claims in Oklahoma were beyond scrutiny, with the executive director’s blessing and the state’s legal imprimatur.

That was 2006. In 2008, the Zorro Trust walked through the door Scroggins had built.

Scroggins himself, in a 2009 interview, drew attention to something remarkable about Oklahoma’s jackpot win rate. He noted that the state’s frequency of jackpot winners was, in his own word, “astounding” for a lottery only four years old. “Many participating states have played Powerball for 10 to 15 years and only had one winner,” he said. Oklahoma, between 2006 and 2008, had produced four unique jackpot winners — two of them on the same day. Scroggins flagged the anomaly. He did not investigate it.

There is something else worth noting about that July 2, 2008 drawing specifically. According to multiple accounts, a computer malfunction disrupted what was ordinarily a live, televised broadcast of the Powerball draw. The drawing went forward without the usual public broadcast, monitored instead by an auditing firm. Why was the night Oklahoma’s largest-ever jackpot was decided also the night the live television feed went dark? That question has never been publicly answered.

After Oklahoma, Scroggins moved to Illinois in 2012, to serve as Chief Financial Officer for the state’s lottery — arriving, characteristically, at a moment of institutional chaos. Illinois had just become the first state in the nation to privatize its lottery operations, hiring a company called Northstar Lottery Group to run its games. Northstar later came under withering scrutiny after a Chicago Tribune investigation found that the lottery had failed to award more than forty percent of the instant game grand prizes it had advertised between 2011 and 2015, with Northstar dramatically increasing the number of printed tickets while dangling ever-larger prizes in front of buyers. Scroggins walked into the middle of that scandal.

And then he vanished from public record entirely.

What we are left with, across Pennsylvania, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Illinois, is a man who repeatedly found himself at the exact intersection of questionable claims, convenient procedural interpretations, and lucrative vendor relationships — and who, when his public career ended, chose silence over the kind of professional visibility that is standard in his industry. We know almost nothing about who he is. That, too, is a kind of answer.

Fact No. 2: The Store

The winning ticket was purchased at a Stripes convenience store in Altus, Oklahoma — a town of 18,000 near an Air Force base, and a six-hour drive from the Zorro Ranch outside Stanley, New Mexico — by Brice Gordon.

Stripes was a chain of convenience stores and gas stations operating primarily in Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico, owned in 2008 by Susser Holdings Corporation, a family-run company headquartered in Corpus Christi, Texas. The Altus location had only recently come under Susser Holdings’ control — the company had completed its acquisition of the Town & Country Food Stores chain in early 2008, absorbing the western Oklahoma locations into its corporate portfolio just months before the July 2 jackpot.

Unlike a franchise operation, where an independent owner might notice and report anomalies, Susser Holdings owned and operated its stores directly. The terminal, the staff, and the ticket inventory at the Altus location all fell under a single corporate chain of command. And at the top of that chain was the company’s Chairman, CEO, and President: Sam L. Susser.

Susser had come to the convenience store business by way of Wall Street. He worked at Salomon Brothers Inc. in the Corporate Finance and Mergers and Acquisitions division from 1985 to 1987. He was on the floor of that institution during the precise months when a man named Ronald Perelman — funded by junk bond king Michael Milken of Drexel Burnham Lambert — made a hostile move to acquire a controlling stake in Salomon Brothers worth $800 million. It was widely described as a junk bond raid. Warren Buffett intervened as a white knight, investing $700 million in convertible preferred stock, which allowed Salomon to buy back the targeted shares. With that, Perelman was dispatched. Susser left Salomon the same year and returned to Texas to build his family’s business.

Fact No. 3: The Lottery Contract

The company that held the Oklahoma lottery contract in 2008 — printing the state’s Powerball tickets and operating the central gaming system that determined the winners — was Scientific Games Corporation. Its largest shareholder, holding nearly forty percent of its stock, was Ronald Perelman.

Let that land for a moment. The man who had tried to seize the firm where the future owner of the winning ticket’s store once worked — Perelman — controlled the company that printed the tickets and ran the system.

Fact No. 4: The Network

Ronald Perelman was not a peripheral figure in Jeffrey Epstein’s world. He appears in Epstein’s personal black book. He hosted the 1995 Palm Beach dinner at which Epstein and President Bill Clinton were first documented in the same room together. And in 2004, Perelman sold his Palm Beach estate, Casa Apava, for $70 million — then a record for Palm Beach real estate — on the same small island where, that same year, Epstein and Donald Trump famously went head to head at a bankruptcy auction for a 62,000 square foot oceanfront mansion called Maison de l’Amitié, the House of Friendship. Trump outbid Epstein, paying $41.35 million. The trustee overseeing the auction described it at the time as “two very large Palm Beach egos going at it.” It was the beginning of the end of their friendship. Within weeks of losing that auction, Epstein found himself under investigation by Palm Beach police.

These three men — Epstein, Trump, and Perelman — did not merely know each other. They occupied the same tightly drawn circle on one of the wealthiest strips of land in America. And Ronald Perelman, alone among them, had the industrial infrastructure to print lottery tickets and run the systems that determined who won.

And it just so happens that his associate, Jeffrey Epstein, was the winner.

Fact No. 5: The New Owners

Eleven years passed between the lottery win and Epstein’s death in a Manhattan federal detention facility on August 10, 2019 — years during which Zorro Ranch was never searched, even as federal investigators examined his other properties. Two days before he died, Epstein changed his will, leaving $100 million and all of his properties to a woman often identified as his last girlfriend, Karyna Shuliak, whom I wrote about in detail a couple of weeks ago. Zorro Ranch was among those properties. Shortly after Epstein’s death, federal investigators instructed then-New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas to pull the plug on any efforts to investigate or search the ranch.

On August 16, 2023, a company called San Rafael Ranch LLC purchased Zorro Ranch from Epstein’s estate for an undisclosed price — the asking price had been reduced from $27.5 million to $18 million before the sale closed. San Rafael Ranch LLC was formed just 19 days before the purchase closed, with a Santa Fe real estate attorney, Charles V. Henry IV, listed as its registered agent. There was no public disclosure of beneficial ownership, until last month, when Clara Bates, a reporter with the Santa Fe New Mexican, was able to find mention of the LLC’s owners in court documents pertaining to the owners’ attempts to force the state of New Mexico to place the value of the ranch at just $9 million for tax purposes — the same tactic Trump has used throughout his career to avoid paying real estate taxes.

The new owners are Don and Mary Catherine Huffines. Court documents list Mary Catherine as trustee and their son Colin as manager of a related entity, San Rafael One LLC.

Don Huffines is a Dallas real estate developer and hard-right Republican politician who, along with his identical twin brother Phillip, co-founded Huffines Communities in 1985, now one of the largest residential real estate development firms in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. A fifth-generation Texan whose family has operated car dealerships in the Dallas metroplex since 1924, Huffines served one term in the Texas State Senate representing North Dallas from 2015 to 2019, ran unsuccessfully against Governor Greg Abbott from the right in 2022, and on March 3, 2026 — three days before this article was published — won the Republican primary for Texas Comptroller, the state’s chief financial officer. A self-described MAGA Republican, he has endorsements from Ted Cruz, the late Charlie Kirk, and just last week, Donald J. Trump. Don and Mary Catherine spent Valentine’s Day in 2025 at Mar-a-Lago.

Another son, Russell Huffines, serves as Associate Director of Agency Outreach in the White House Office of Cabinet Affairs under President Donald J. Trump, and co-runs HEST Investments — a Dallas-based venture capital family office — alongside his father.

And here’s where the dot-connecting comes full circle. Remember Sam L. Susser? Yeah. Hold on to your hats, friends. It’s about to get bumpy.

In 2014, Sam L. Susser sold Susser Holdings Corporation — the parent company of the Stripes convenience store chain — to Energy Transfer Partners for approximately $1.8 billion. He then relocated to Dallas, where he founded Susser Bank, a private financial institution, taking on the role of Chairman. To help govern it, he assembled a board that included James R. Huffines — Don Huffines’ older brother.

James Huffines is a veteran Texas banker who had served as President and Chief Operating Officer of PlainsCapital Corporation before becoming COO of Hilltop Holdings, the financial empire built by Dallas billionaire Gerald J. Ford.

Ford, it happens, had built a significant portion of that empire in partnership with Ronald Perelman — the same Ronald Perelman whose company printed Oklahoma’s Powerball tickets in 2008, and whose name appears in Jeffrey Epstein’s personal black book.

In March 2026, the newly-created Epstein Survivor’s Truth Commission ordered Don and Mary Catherine Huffines to immediately halt all construction at the now-renamed San Rafael Ranch, finding the new front gate was being built without proper permitting. Aerial shots taken by the New York Times showed that the Huffines had also excavated a large portion of the ranch’s helipad and labyrinth gardens, leaving a deep, massive hole in a property where witnesses said two “foreign girls” had been buried on orders from Epstein and Maxwell after being murdered during “rough fetish sex.”

In tomorrow’s Part 3 of this series, I will take a closer look at the businesses Don and Russell Huffines run together through HEST Investments, and how at least one of their portfolio companies — which works with neonatal cardiac tissue harvested within 30 days of live birth — occupies a field of science that was of well-documented special interest to Jeffrey Epstein.

Image: The Stripes convenience store in Altus, Oklahoma, that sold the winning Powerball ticket to Zorro Trust in 2008.

🎩 Author Alisa Valdes (Rodriguez)

▓▓▓—▓▓▓—▓▓▓

ECP NetHappenings: Education how handwriting shapes the human brain

❤️️ Sign Up ©2026 NetHappenings News Email List
https://cyberplayground.org
©2026 Follow@CyberPlayGround
©1998-©2026 *Educational CyberPlayGround®
©2026 https://k12playground.com
©2026 https://RichAsHell.com
©1993 – ©2026 https://edu-cyberpg.com

Brian Reed @BReed83314
The whole world is still horrified that country club Republicans conned hillbillies from the holler to get them to vote Republican and elect the worst President in the history of the USA.

EDUCATION

ESSAY
Massimo @Rainmaker1973

For more than 20 years, Norwegian neuroscientist Audrey van der Meer has investigated how handwriting shapes the human brain.

In a landmark 2024 study published in Frontiers in Psychology, her team used high-density EEG caps to monitor brain activity in students while they either wrote by hand with a digital pen or typed on a keyboard.

The difference was dramatic. Handwriting produced a powerful, synchronized burst of neural activity across widespread regions of the brain, linking areas involved in memory formation, sensory processing, and deep learning. In contrast, typing the exact same content caused this rich cognitive network to largely shut down. Because typing uses repetitive, uniform keystrokes, it demands little spatial or cognitive effort, leaving key learning centers quiet and disengaged.

These neurological differences have a direct effect on how we process and remember information. Earlier research by Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer at Princeton University reached similar conclusions. Students who took notes by hand consistently outperformed those using laptops on conceptual understanding tests. Handwriting forces active listening, critical thinking, and real-time summarization, while typing often leads to verbatim transcription with minimal processing.

Our brains function as part of an embodied biological system. Replacing rich physical actions with effortless digital keystrokes may deliver short-term convenience, but it comes at the expense of deeper cognitive engagement.

The solution is simple and timeless: pick up a pen.

[Van der Meer, A. L. H., et al. (2024). Handwriting versus typing: A neurophysiological comparison of brain activity during learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1234567]

▓▓▓—▓▓▓—▓▓▓

ECP NetHappenings Kids’ shows used to be this calm on purpose

❤️️ Sign Up ©2026 NetHappenings News Email List
https://cyberplayground.org
©2026 Follow@CyberPlayGround
©1998-©2026 *Educational CyberPlayGround®
©2026 https://k12playground.com
©2026 https://RichAsHell.com
©1993 – ©2026 https://edu-cyberpg.com

Education

We didn’t realize it then, but kids’ shows used to be this calm on purpose.

ESSAY
Anish Moonka
@anishmoonka
Jun 15

Fred Rogers met with a child psychologist every week for 22 years to build his show. She shaped everything: every script, prop, and song. The whole point was to give a child’s nervous system time to slow down. In 1984, a single regulatory decision ended all of it.

The psychologist was Dr. Margaret McFarland, who co-founded the Arsenal Family and Children’s Center alongside Benjamin Spock and Erik Erikson. She and Rogers understood that the prefrontal cortex in children, the part of the brain that controls impulse, emotion, and attention, takes decades to fully develop. At the start of every episode, Rogers tied his sneakers and changed his sweater while children settled in. Those pauses were intentional, designed to help a child’s nervous system shift into a calmer, more focused state.

What ended it had nothing to do with child development science. In 1984, Reagan’s FCC chairman Mark Fowler abolished the advertising limits that had protected children’s programming from commercial pressure. Toy companies moved within months. Between 1984 and 1985, cartoons tied to toy lines increased by 300%, from a handful of shows to more than 40 animated series. In almost every case, the toy was designed first. The cartoon was built to sell it.

Researchers later put numbers to what parents were already noticing. A 2011 study in Pediatrics from the University of Virginia tested 60 four-year-olds across three groups: one watching SpongeBob, which cuts scene every 11 seconds; one watching a slow PBS show, which cuts scene every 34 seconds; and one drawing. Nine minutes later, all three took tests on attention, impulse control, short-term memory, and problem-solving. The SpongeBob group scored significantly worse across every measure.

In the 1970s, children began watching television around age 4. Research from pediatrician Dimitri Christakis found that by 2009, the average age of first screen exposure had dropped to 4 months, as the content got faster and the audience got younger. Researchers separately found that each additional hour of daily screen time at ages 1 or 3 raised the risk of attention problems at age 7 by 9%.

ESSAY

Anish Moonka
@anishmoonka

A 5,300-year-old man was found frozen in the Alps in 1991. He had 61 tattoos, all made by rubbing carbon soot into cuts. The vast majority were placed on joints where he had severe arthritis: knees, ankles, lower back. He was using them to treat chronic pain.

His name was Otzi, and his tattoos come roughly 2,000 years before the oldest surviving written records of acupuncture in China. A 2015 analysis of his tattoo placements found that around 80% correspond to acupuncture points, the exact spots traditional Chinese medicine targets for pain. The person who made those marks knew exactly where the pain lived.

The word “tattoo” didn’t enter the English language until 1769, when Captain James Cook brought it back from Polynesia. Polynesian communities had called the practice tatau for centuries. Before Cook, English had no name for it.

Meanwhile, the rest of the world had been tattooing for thousands of years. It meant something different wherever it appeared. Ancient Egyptian mummies from around 2000 BCE had tattoos of dots and dashes across their abdomens and thighs, which researchers connect to protective rituals around fertility and childbirth.

In Siberia, a group of mummies called the Pazyryk, dated to around 500 BCE, had elaborate animal tattoos covering their arms and shoulders: horses, deer, fish, mythical creatures. The more complex the tattoos, the higher the social rank. Their chief had the most intricate designs. Rome took tattooing in a completely different direction, using it purely as punishment.

Slaves were marked on their faces with the Latin word “stigma.” Criminals were tattooed the same way. Emperor Constantine banned facial tattooing in 316 CE, arguing that faces were made in God’s image and shouldn’t be defaced. The practice shifted to hands and arms.

The Maori of New Zealand built one of the most sophisticated tattoo systems ever documented. Each person’s ta moko, the facial tattoo unique to them, encoded lineage, rank, personal history, and military achievement. When Maori chiefs signed treaties with European settlers in the 19th century, some drew their ta moko instead of their names. Each design worked as a legal signature.

As for the cannibalism theory: anthropologists have suggested that in Pacific Island cultures where ritual cannibalism occurred, tribal tattoos marked group membership. Consuming someone who carried your group’s marks was considered taboo. Evidence for it is indirect, but researchers in Polynesian history still cite it as a real secondary reason.

Samuel O’Reilly patented the first electric tattoo machine in 1891, adapting a design from Edison’s electric pen. For 5,300 years before that, people in the Alps, Egypt, Siberia, New Zealand, and Rome were making the same marks by hand, for reasons that barely overlapped.

ECP NetHappenings Congress Insider Trading Must Stop

❤️️ Sign Up ©2026 NetHappenings News Email List
https://cyberplayground.org
©2026 Follow@CyberPlayGround
©1998-©2026 *Educational CyberPlayGround®
©2026 https://k12playground.com
©2026 https://RichAsHell.com
©1993 – ©2026 https://edu-cyberpg.com

Blanche devised and signed an immunity deal shielding Trump and his family from “all claims” arising out of “any matters” — then Trump nominated him attorney general.

Robert De Niro just blasted Donald Trump yesterday, saying for him to: “Shut the fuck up.”

The Oligarch’s are not reading the room
David Sirota @davidsirota
There’s a real late-stage-feudalism vibe with the current king holding gladiatorial events at his castle… …the past king marveling at his new self-portrait in the shrine he built for himself… …and all of the serfs being unable to afford food.
“The rising tide of 401(k) hardship withdrawals isn’t happening in a vacuum; it’s a direct symptom of broader economic pressures squeezing American households. Persistent inflation, which has eroded purchasing power over the past few years…”

Rep. John Larson @RepJohnLarson
‘DOGE’ was never about efficiency. They want to steal your data and slash your benefits. That’s what Trump, Musk, and the billionaires are demanding.
Social Security is an EARNED BENEFIT that YOU paid for. It doesn’t belong to Elon Musk or any of his buddies on Wall Street.

Coinbase announces the first, 1:1 backed tokenized stocks are coming, stating “No derivatives, no IOUs.” @brian_armstrong said on X, users can “own an actual chunk of the company onchain.” Armstrong adds, it’s a “great step towards unlocking global access to U.S. markets.”

Heart protection from COVID shots remains amid updates, study finds
Despite continued benefits, anti-vaccine rhetoric has driven down vaccination.

Jane Fonda: It’s not about Democrat or Republican or left or right.
It’s about right or wrong, and it is wrong for people to be attacked and called terrorists for exercising their rights and freedoms. It’s time for Americans all across the country, all across the political spectrum who care about these freedoms to stand up creatively, non-violently, to defend these rights while we can. We must do this now. Because if we don’t, we’re not going to have any rights to defend.

We reject: kings, presidents, and voting.
We believe in: rough consensus and running code. —David Clark, 1992
said during a plenary presentation at the 24th Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) conference.
This motto encapsulates the technical and political values of the Internet engineering community during the Internet-OSI Standards War, a period of intense competition between the informal, pragmatic TCP/IP approach and the formal, bureaucratic Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model.
Clark graduated from Swarthmore College in 1966. In 1968, he received his master’s and engineer’s degrees in electrical engineering from MIT, where he worked on the I/O architecture of Multics under Jerry Saltzer. He received his Ph.D. in electrical engineering from MIT in 1973.

Oklahoma Democrats recently forced a vote to ban child marriage.
36 Republicans voted no …damn perverts!

Fox News’ top Defense Correspondent just admitted that Donald Trump’s deal will not end Iran’s nuclear ambitions. This is terrible. Iranian media says the U.S. agreed to present reconstruction plans for Iran amounting to at least 300 billion dollars.

The reason you know we lost the war and surrendered to Iran is the fact that the terms of the “Deal” are secret. Such agreements are never secret, except in the Trump administration. Trump has to keep it secret to avoid disclosing how much he paid to get oil flowing before the midterms.
$300,000,000,000 for Iran
$0 for you
America First!
The golden age!
If this was the Obama Deal, MAGA would be LOSING THEIR MINDS. And rightfully so.

Bill Kristol @BillKristol
“America lost the war…We will exit the war with none of those goals achieved, and in order to end the war, America had to submit to a host of Iranian conditions. We lost and there is no reasonable way to hide this fact.”

@CMPunk: “No, I wouldn’t go to the White House — If David Duke invites me over for tacos I’m not going. A racist is a racist. I call it like I see it.”

Dana White says he can’t afford another UFC event at the trailer park…I mean the White House.

Surveillance: YouTube could be banned for 16 & 17-year-olds overnight under the U.K.’s proposed social media curfew.

Australia’s richest person, Gina Rinehart, has reportedly taken a $1 billion stake in SpaceX.

SpaceX’s surge added approximately $165,000,000,000.00 to Elon Musk’s net worth today — larger than Bill Gates’ entire fortune.

Epstein didn’t just own Zorro Ranch – he turned thousands of acres of public grazing land into a giant moat around his compound. No livestock, just privacy and control.
Once those girls were inside, there was nowhere to run.
#Justice #EpsteinTrumpCoverUp #DemsUnited

So this piece of shit coward is in the hospital.
According to news reports, He’s not doing well.
He refused to impeach Trump for the January 6th attack on the Capitol.
Yet he blamed Trump for the Jan 6th attack.
He could have prevented a 2nd Trump term.
He could have prevented all the bullshit Trump and his family are putting the American people through.
He’s a fucking coward.
He doesn’t even deserve “Thoughts and Prayers”.
@SenMcConnell Fuck You.

PROFESSIONAL LOOTERS

ESSAY
Ricardo @Ric_RTP

This AI just exposed the BIGGEST legal insider trading operation in America.

A platform called GovGreed built a seven-layer machine learning system that cross-references every stock trade disclosed by every sitting politician against the bills their committees control, the campaign donations they receive, and the companies their votes directly impact.

It scored all 540 politicians currently in Congress. And the numbers are crazy:

56% of every stock purchase made by Congress in the last 16 months was on a stock directly affected by a bill the buyer later voted on. That is 6,170 out of 11,016 total purchases.

More than HALF of all congressional stock buys are on companies whose fate that same politician is about to decide.

343 of 540 Congress members actively trade stocks while holding access to nonpublic legislative information.

That is 63.8% of the entire legislature making market bets with an informational edge that would put any hedge fund manager in prison.

The AI identified 752 active “Triple Signals” in the current Congress. A Triple Signal fires when three conditions line up at once:

The politician sits on the committee controlling a bill, they traded stock in a company affected by that bill, AND they received campaign contributions from that same industry.

Bills carrying these insider indicators pass at 5.4 TIMES the normal rate.

Now look at the individual leaderboard:

– Nancy Pelosi’s estimated portfolio sits at $194 million with a Greediness score of 98.1 out of 100
– Ro Khanna made 13,231 trades across 800+ different tickers
– Michael McCaul made 32,302 trades and filed 6,670 of them late
– Thomas Suozzi filed 86.4% of his trades late with an average delay of 396 days, meaning his disclosures landed over a YEAR after he made the trade

And then there is Lisa McClain, the fourth-ranking Republican in the House. She has made 1,443 trades in three years, more than 98% of all politicians tracked.

She violated the STOCK Act twice in a single year, disclosing up to $900,000 in trades months after the legal deadline. Her husband bought up to $250,000 in Elon Musk’s xAI, which quietly converted into SpaceX equity before last Friday’s $2 trillion IPO.

The penalty for all of this? A $200 fine.

The number of Congress members ever prosecuted under the STOCK Act since it passed in 2012? Zero.

And the cruelest part is this:

A bill to ban congressional stock trading was introduced in January 2026. It has bipartisan support. Over 80% of American voters want it passed.

But Congress is sitting on it, because the people who would have to vote yes are the same people making millions from the system staying exactly the way it is.

They write the insider trading laws, they exempt themselves from enforcement, they trade on the information those laws generate, and when they get caught, they pay a fine that is basically nothing.

The AI didn’t discover anything Congress was hiding. It just organized what was already public into a pattern so obvious that nobody can pretend it isn’t there anymore.

▓▓▓—▓▓▓—▓▓▓