You can be on the side of the billionaire class or you can be on the side of the working class, but you can't be on the side of both. https://t.co/PPrlM0CFsa
Mayor Pete claims, without evidence, that he is the winner. He’s the one who needs to give an explanation on his link to Shadow inc.
@AndrewYang
2020 US Presidential Candidate (D). Entrepreneur
It sure looks like Bernie won Iowa. Excited to compete for the win in New Hampshire on Tuesday!
@MMFlint
One thing is undisputed: Bernie won the most votes in Iowa. He got the most votes in the 1st round, then he got the most votes in the 2nd round. No one else ever led. More people in Iowa voted for Bernie than Pete or Elizabeth or Joe. Period. Bernie won Iowa. Sorry billionaires. https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/1225547182394265602
Chinese doctor Li Wenliang who tried to warn us about the Coronavirus is DEAD
COMMUNIST PARTY DICTATES WHAT YOU ARE AND ARE NOT ALLOWED TO KNOW OR TALK ABOUT.
RIP Chinese doctor Li Wenliang, who was accused of spreading rumors after trying to warn colleagues about coronavirus, has died from Coronavirus illness at 34 years old 2/6/2020
HERO Dr. Li Wenliang, an ophthalmologist working in Wuhan, tried to warn people about the coronavirus in late December. But he was silenced by police. He died from the virus on Friday local time, at the age of 34. Li Wenliang, 34, was reportedly reprimanded for “spreading rumors.”
The Story Of How China Announced The Death Of Dr Li Wenliang & Then Allegedly Told Doctors To Put His Body On Life Support & Say He Was ‘Critical’. A Grotesque End To The Story Of A Brave Man Who Tried To Warn About The #coronavirus & Has Now Died From It.
Save face versus tell the truth.
Li Wenliang, one of the original 8 doctors who initially raised the alarm on the chinese coronavirus outbreak in December, died from the virus on Thursday. Caixin, GT, and Beijing News originally reported and then DELETED stories of his death due to social media outrage. A news article said he wasn’t really dead, he was in ICU then they announced he had died.
As many experts question the veracity of China’s statistics for the Wuhan coronavirus outbreak, Tencent over the weekend appeared to inadvertently release what is potentially the actual number of infections and deaths — which are far higher than official figures, but eerily in line with predictions from a respected scientific journal.
As early as Jan. 26, netizens were reporting that Tencent, on its webpage titled “Epidemic Situation Tracker,” briefly showed data on the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China that was much higher than official estimates, before suddenly switching to lower numbers. Hiroki Lo, a 38-year-old Taiwanese beverage store owner, that day reported that Tencent and NetEase were both posting “unmodified statistics,” before switching to official numbers in short order.
Lo told Taiwan News than on Jan. 26 he checked the numbers on both Tencent and NetEase and found them “really scary.” He said he did not know whether the numbers were real or not, but did not have much time to think about it as he had a busy day of work ahead at his store.
Lo said he did not check the numbers again until he went home that evening, when he was shocked to see they had dropped dramatically and “something was wrong.” He said he noticed individuals on a Hong Kong Facebook group also observed the same bizarre occurrence that day.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRejectRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.